Following the announcement of a memorandum of understanding between Iran and the United States, it is time to revisit some criminal documents.
Back in early March, as Israel mobilised all its American cards to launch a war on Iran, Zionist writer Bret Stephens, who has a regular column in The New York Times, where he fervently defends an Israel that trains dogs to rape human beings - published his bucket list of what he wished Israel and the US should achieve against what he thought would soon be a defeated Iran.
With the immediate cessation of hostilities between Iran and the US, it is time to revisit that gaudy, delusional and unhinged column.
Stephens envisaged four scenarios of Israeli victory against Iran. The first was regime change, which he thought "nobody should discount, especially if Iran continues to be battered militarily and politically, perhaps with the loss of additional echelons of leadership".
The second was regime modification - "a regime that stays in place but complies with US and Israeli demands". That isolation, he wrote, "will be especially pronounced if US forces seize Kharg Island . . . which serves as the terminal for roughly 90 percent of Iran's oil exports".
