June 11, 2026
2 min read
Add topic to email alerts
Receive an email when new articles are posted on
Please provide your email address to receive an email when new articles are posted on .
Imagine a scenario: A physician discusses a potential treatment with a patient in the office but does not recommend it. The physician’s ambient listening technology hallucinates a recommendation for that treatment and documents this in the electronic health record. The patient reads the note, undergoes the treatment and suffers a serious adverse reaction. The patient sues. Who is responsible?
June 11, 2026
2 min read
Add topic to email alerts
Receive an email when new articles are posted on
Please provide your email address to receive an email when new articles are posted on .

AI medical advice changes care decisions of most users: survey

UK doctors might be sued for errors made by AI

AMA and lawmakers push back on AI care denials

Consequences For Lawyers Who Fail To Catch Opposing Counsel Relying On AI Hallucinations In Their Legal Briefs

The AI tools shaping patient care may be operating outside regulatory oversight. MIT researchers say it's time to change that.

Ambient AI is transforming clinical documentation. But what happens when patients can audit the record, not the source?

AI notetakers are helpful and save time, say doctors, who say the auditor general missed a crucial quality-control step in her…

The AMA adopted new AI policies in a bid to ensure that the technology supports evidence-based medicine, bolsters patient care…

60% of evaluated AI Scribe systems mixed up prescribed drugs in patient notes, auditors say

AI is revolutionizing ethical decision-making in healthcare litigation by accelerating clinical decisions, but complicating…

Ambient scribes were the first large-scale application of AI in health care. Now developers are pitching them as diligent…