Self-custody in crypto challenges traditional finance by empowering individuals with true asset ownership.
Key takeaways
Traditional finance involves multiple layers of intermediaries, affecting true ownership of assets.
Self-custody in crypto provides unique optionality that influences infrastructure and business models.
Self-custody should be viewed as a sovereign right, similar to property rights.
The transition to online assets has led to a loss of ownership, which blockchain can help restore.
Delayed Ownership on Ethereum: A Different Custody Model
BTC collateral vaults: how an agent posts native Bitcoin against an obligation without a custodian
What Am I Actually Depending On? A Practical Approach to Data Sovereignty
Strategy's Saylor says Bitcoin should avoid choosing between 'purity and adoption' as BTC extends losses
Charles Hoskinson Returns, Says Cardano Will Beat Bitcoin: Why Is ADA Going Down?
choose between two fundamentally flawed options. On one hand, centralized, custodial platforms offer...
Take control of your crypto in 2026 with wallets offering MPC, cloud backups, and multichain privacy features for full…
Sometimes safe and boring can be a winning strategy. Now crypto’s safekeepers, which hold more than $500 billion in digital…
Broader crypto adoption hinges on a question that traditional markets solved long ago: who holds the assets, and under what…
Delayed Ownership on Ethereum: A Different Custody Model Most Ethereum assets assume a simple...
Custodia Bank prepares a Supreme Court petition challenging the Federal Reserve's authority to deny master accounts to…
