Skip to Content Subscribe Our Offers My Account Manage My Subscriptions FAQ Newsletters Canada Canadian True Crime Canadian Politics Health World Israel & Middle East Financial Post NP Comment Longreads Puzzmo Diversions Comics NP News Quiz New York Times Crossword Horoscopes Life Eating & Drinking Style Sponsored Play for Ontario Travel Travel Canada Travel USA Travel International Cruises Travel Essentials Culture Books Celebrity Movies Music Theatre Television Business Essentials Advice Lives Told Tails Told Shopping Buy Canadian Home Living Outdoor Living Tech Style & Beauty Kitchen & Dining Personal Care Entertainment & Hobbies Gift Guide Travel Guide Deals Savings National Post Store More Sports Hockey Baseball Basketball Football Soccer Golf Tennis Driving Vehicle Research Reviews News Gear Guide Obituaries Place an Obituary Place an In Memoriam Classifieds Place an Ad Celebrations Working Business Ads Archives Healthing Epaper Manage Print Subscription Profile Settings My Subscriptions Saved Articles My Offers Newsletters Customer Service FAQ Newsletters Canada World Financial Post NP Comment Longreads Puzzmo Diversions Life Shopping Epaper Manage Print Subscription HomeNewsCanadaB.C. man ordered to pay $210K in rape case where judge rejected 'sexsomnia' as the reasonWoman describes herself as 'a shadow of her former self' after being sexually assaulted by Karl Richard Antonius, who claimed he was asleep when he did so You can save this article by registering for free here. Or sign-in if you have an account.Karl Richard Antonius, seen here exiting a Vancouver court in 2020, claimed he was experiencing an incident of sexsomnia when he sexually assaulted a woman sleeping next to him in 2015. Photo by Mike Bell/PNGA woman sexually assaulted by a man who used a sleep disorder known as “sexsomnia” as part of his defence at trial has been awarded just over $210,000 in damages by the Supreme Court of B.C.Enjoy the latest local, national and international news.Exclusive articles by Conrad Black, Barbara Kay and others. Plus, special edition NP Platformed and First Reading newsletters and virtual events.Unlimited online access to National Post.National Post ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition to view on any device, share and comment on.Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword.Support local journalism.Enjoy the latest local, national and international news.Exclusive articles by Conrad Black, Barbara Kay and others. Plus, special edition NP Platformed and First Reading newsletters and virtual events.Unlimited online access to National Post.National Post ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition to view on any device, share and comment on.Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword.Support local journalism.Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience.Access articles from across Canada with one account.Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments.Enjoy additional articles per month.Get email updates from your favourite authors.Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience.Access articles from across Canada with one accountShare your thoughts and join the conversation in the commentsEnjoy additional articles per monthGet email updates from your favourite authorsSign In or Create an AccountorIn convicting Karl Richard Antonius of one count of sexual assault in July 2020, now-retired Justice Austin Cullen didn’t dismiss his “impressive array of parasomnias” — conditions that cause abnormal experiences or behaviours during sleep — but rejected the notion that his newly-diagnosed history with them supported an argument that “his conduct was involuntary.”Antonius, then 53 years old, was sentenced to two years less a day that October and was granted day parole after serving seven months and five days, according to Justice Warren B. Milman’s recently published lawsuit decision. Get a dash of perspective along with the trending news of the day in a very readable format.By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc.A welcome email is on its way. If you don't see it, please check your junk folder.The next issue of NP Posted will soon be in your inbox.We encountered an issue signing you up. Please try againThe assault in question occurred more than a decade ago on Sept. 27, 2015, in Vancouver when Antonius, in his late 40s at the time, was on a blind date with a 28-year-old woman whose identity is protected by a publication ban and is only identified in his conviction and civil suit decision as T.K.During the trial, she testified to having no interest in having sex with Antonius that night, but trusted him enough to sleep next to him at his hotel apartment after realizing a friend had her house keys. Wearing a t-shirt and shorts he supplied, the woman got into the bed and lay on her left side and was joined then by Antonius, who touched her bottom at least once and also attempted to move the shorts down. She said she denied his advances, swatting his hand away at one point, and he seemed to accept that she was only interested in sleeping. When she awoke in the same position some time later, however, she found Antonius had removed her shorts and her underwear and was having unprotected sex with her.“T.K. said she was ‘kind of was still waking up and not really sure of what was happening.’ She ‘was like slowly coming out of sleep’, ‘was kind of in shock’, and ‘didn’t know what to do,” Cullen summarized. “She said it took a moment for her to realize what was happening and she just froze.”Antonius finished, rose without saying anything and left the bedroom. The two soon parted ways without mentioning what had occurred and T.K. never responded to his calls or messages thereafter. When charged in 2016, Antonius told police he thought she was lying in an attempt to extort money from him and “attributed the finding of his DNA on her to the fact she was wearing his boxer shorts and the absence of semen being consistent with his belief that she was not being truthful,” Cullen wrote.But three years into the case, Antonius began to wonder if T.K. had dreamt about the sexual assault and said his research led him to the topic of sexsomnia, which he said gets “lumped together” with “sleep eating,” something he did but was never formally diagnosed with.“As a result of what he has learned about sexsomnia, he now accepts that he did have sexual intercourse with T.K.,” Cullen wrote. “He said that he feels terrible for her, terrible for himself, but especially for her.”Several witnesses called by the defence at trial recounted stories of a fully-nude Antonius sleepwalking and sleep eating. One witness, a former sexual partner, testified that he appeared to initiate sex while asleep, only to roll over and resume sleeping immediately after.Three medical experts also diagnosed him with parasomnia, two of whom cast a degree of doubt as to whether it was an incident of parasomnia and a third who categorically said it wasn’t.Cullen accepted that “those experiencing parasomnia episodes can perform relatively complex tasks” but said Antonius’s actions with T.K. “involve consciousness of the context in which it was occurring.”“The accused had to undress himself, undress her by removing her boxer shorts and her panties, and initiate sexual intercourse with her without awakening her,” the judge wrote, noting it “implies a cautious approach and a conscious purpose.”Before he was convicted, Antonius was removed as President of Vancouver-based Boreal Metals Corp., a mineral exploration company focused on historical mining project areas in Sweden and Norway, after the allegations against him and the sexsomnia defence came to light in November 2019. The company said its board of directors “had not been made aware of the nature of charges made against Mr. Antonius or his defence to them.”In an affidavit for her sexual battery civil suit filed in November 2022, T.K. said she was worried that Antonius impregnated her or “given her the herpes virus, with which she was diagnosed four years later,” Justice Warren B. Milman wrote.She described herself as a “confident” and “outgoing person” who liked spending time with friends and meeting new people before the assault. “Now, after 11 years, she describes herself as a ‘shadow of her former self,’” as she struggles to maintain relationships, forge new ones, and trust people, men in particular.“Her world has become much smaller because she is reluctant to venture from her safe haven at home. Her view is that the defendant robbed her of her safety and sense of self.”Many of her struggles are also documented in an affidavit filed by her mother, who said her daughter “has not been able to move forward with her life.”Antonius failed to file any response to the court, resulting in a default judgment against him in October 2024.T.K. had been seeking $250,000 in non-pecuniary damages (pain and suffering), but was awarded $200,000, which includes a $50,000 in aggravating component due to the betrayal of trust and the “profound impact… on the course” of her life.Milman denied her request for $50,000 in punitive damages, finding that the trial judge imposed an “adequate” sentence.She will also receive $7,640.62 for counselling already obtained and another $3,042 for future sessions, for a total award of $210,682.62, plus the cost of her legal fees.Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our newsletters here. Join the Conversation This website uses cookies to personalize your content (including ads), and allows us to analyze our traffic. Read more about cookies here. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.