The Delhi High Court has ordered the removal of pornographic deepfake and AI-generated content featuring actor Naga Chaitanya from online platforms within 24 hours.
Delhi HC orders Naga Chaitanya's pornographic deepfake content to be removed
Jun 02, 2026
04:23 pm
What's the storyThe Delhi High Court has granted interim relief to actor Naga Chaitanya in a case concerning the unauthorized use of his personality rights.
The court ordered the removal of impugned content from online merchandise platforms, pornographic websites, and YouTube channels that exploit his name, voice, image, likeness, and other personality attributes.
Delhi HC orders takedown of pornographic, deepfake, AI content targeting Naga Chaitanya; gives sites 24 hours to comply
Delhi HC orders takedown of pornographic, deepfake, unauthorised content using Naga Chaitanya's persona
Delhi HC protects personality rights of actor Naga Chaitanya
Naga Chaitanya wins interim court relief over Samantha Ruth Prabhu AI cheating claims and deepfakes
Naga Chaitanya approaches court over personality rights and defamatory AI content
Naga Chaitanya approaches Delhi HC over content suggesting he cheated on Samantha Ruth Prabhu, explicit search terms
Samantha Ruth Prabhu’s ex-husband Naga Chaitanya moves court seeking protection against allegations of him cheating on her: ‘This is trolling…’
Sobhita Dhulipala shares biggest life lesson public scrutiny taught her amid husband Naga Chaitanya's legal action over claims he cheated on Samantha Ruth Prabhu
Naga Chaitanya had moved court alleging violation of his personality rights through deepfake and pornographic content.
The Court directed multiple defendants to remove the impugned content and comply with its directions within 24 hours of receiving…
Telugu star Naga Chaitanya has approached the Delhi High Court to combat deepfakes, AI misuse, and objectionable online content…
Delhi HC protects personality rights of actor Naga Chaitanya
The counsel told the court that it was 'trolling' and not 'fair criticism'
The counsel told the court that it was 'trolling' and not 'fair criticism'
