AI Smart Contract Review
Disclosure: AI tools were used for source collection and editorial review. The article was written by a human author, who checked the facts, code, and conclusions.
Crypto risk disclosure: This article is a technical explanation, not investment advice. It is not a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any cryptoasset.
AI Smart Contract Review fails when a team treats a model sentence as an audit conclusion. The useful version of AI Smart Contract Review is narrower: the model can point at suspicious code, but the finding has to survive tool evidence, an execution path, a standard requirement, and human review before anyone calls it an audit result.
The practical trap is not that models are always wrong. Papers such as GPTScan, iAudit, and Smart-LLaMA all support some model-assisted value. The problem is that useful triage is not the same claim as complete security review.
