1. Experts and diplomats analyze the “constructive strategic stability” framework from Trump-Xi summit in Beijing, noting its long-term strategic importance beyond the event's spectacle [para. 1].2. Jia Qingguo views the summit as setting the tone for long-term U.S.-China ties, beyond mere risk management [para. 2].3. Jia explains “constructive” means promoting cooperation as main focus, “strategic” a long-term view, “stability” managing differences to prevent conflicts [para. 3].4. Zhao Hai says the paradigm counters U.S. “strategic competition” framing, which crowds out cooperation and ignores ties' complexity [para. 4].5. Agreement on new term shows U.S. concessions amid Trump's challenges like midterms and Iran; stability is dynamic/strategic [para. 5].6. Zhao clarifies overarching strategic stability via communication, summits, consultations, bargaining for joint problem-solving per Xi's framework [para. 6].7. Beijing summit follows October 2025 Busan trade truce, opening new phase for future relations [para. 7].8. New framework doesn't reject “G2” but notes its ambiguity; U.S.-China can't dictate all global issues alone [para. 8].9. Observers like Sean Stein await details on framework but note summit's success [para. 9].10. Da Wei expects no change in tech competition but possible U.S. easing of export controls to China [para. 10].11. Xi cited ‘Thucydides Trap’; Allison says leaders discussed Straits privately, agreeing no desire for war [para. 11].12. Allison: leaders recognize structural competition risks but won't let Taiwan provocations lead to war [para. 12].13. Campbell contrasts Biden's detailed summit prep/coordination with Trump's bypassing it [para. 13].14. Trump's approach left Taiwan anxious without U.S. briefing [para. 14].15. Thornton: Beijing valued symbolic talks over deliverables; no big expectations [para. 15].16. Thornton: U.S. allies near China welcome stability boost [para. 16].AI generated, for reference only