Actor Darshan had sought directions to the Ministry of Information and Broadcasting and the Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology (MeitY) to act on his complaint, filed in January 2026, against some media houses under provisions of the Cable Television Networks Regulations (CTNR) Act 1995, CTN Rules, Information Technology (IT) Act of 2000, IT (Intermediary Guidelines and Digital Media Ethics Code) Rules, 2021.
| Photo Credit: Video Grab
Observing that reports telecast on television channels and published on digital platforms on the ongoing murder trial involving Kannada actor Darshan, a prime accused, ‘prima facie amount to a calculated, media-driven adjudication, contrary to norms and in violation of court injunctions’, the High Court of Karnataka has directed the Central Government to act on the complaint filed by the actor against media houses.“The material placed on record, particularly the clippings produced, unfortunately depict a disturbing trend wherein the broadcast media has gone to the extent of recreating courtroom proceedings, with only the face of the presiding judge being masked, while the faces of the accused and counsel are openly displayed,” the court stated.Such programmes, the court stated, are telecast on every date of hearing, thereby ‘converting pending judicial proceedings’ into a form of ‘public spectacle’.Justice Sachin Shankar Magadum passed the order while partly allowing a petition filed by Darshan, who is accused number 2 in the Renukaswamy murder case of 2024.Darshan had sought directions to the Ministry of Information and Broadcasting and the Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology (MeitY) to act on his complaint, filed in January 2026, against the media houses under provisions of the Cable Television Networks Regulations (CTNR) Act 1995, CTN Rules, Information Technology (IT) Act of 2000, IT (Intermediary Guidelines and Digital Media Ethics Code) Rules, 2021.The actor contended, in his petition, that although the trial remained nascent, television and digital platforms conducted a media trial, spreading speculation, selective leaks and unverified claims, shaping public opinion, undermining a fair trial and violating media laws.The petition further stated that despite interim injunctions from civil court and the High Court restraining publication of confidential charge sheet material, several television channels and digital platforms continued to telecast such content in violation of the orders.
