The president’s outbursts on allies and Nato were further confirmation that Europe cannot wait to bolster security – and Britain must play its part
“S
he had no more surprises for him; the unexpected in her behaviour was the only thing to expect,” Henry James wrote in his novel Daisy Miller. Leaders dealing with Donald Trump surely recognise the sentiment. James’s character was a young American out of her depth in Europe, falling victim to prejudices. Mr Trump is a real-world problem, and this time, Europe is battered by the prejudices and vengefulness of the American.
This week alone the US president has publicly mocked the British prime minister and armed forces (as weak), the French president (over his marriage), told allies to get their own oil – having set the Middle East on fire – and said leaving Nato was “beyond reconsideration”. Mr Trump’s wishful thinking has hit reality in Iran, where the war that he and Benjamin Netanyahu began will not be easily ended. His resulting frustration, concern about domestic political repercussions and desire to distract the public are matched by vindictiveness towards allies who rightly refused to join in.
Yet there was little shock at his remarks; rather, weary annoyance and alarm. The unpredictability of Mr Trump is built in, and so is the direction of travel – away from the liberal international order and traditional alliances, notably with Europe. The question is not one of direction, but of timing and degree. Remaining in Nato in name is not the same as upholding it. In calling it a paper tiger he again eroded the collective security guarantee. His pointed addition that Vladimir Putin “knows that too” was hardly necessary. Some in Europe – including parts of the British security establishment – still hope that he is an aberration, and that the transatlantic relationship could return to normal in a few years. But more emollient approaches also aim to buy time for Ukraine and the lengthy project of building up European defence.
