The decision was a temporary reprieve for the government but will intensify a political battle over how Britain should house tens of thousands of asylum seekers.
Supported by
The decision was a temporary reprieve for the government but will intensify a political battle over how Britain should house tens of thousands of asylum seekers.
By Lizzie Dearden
Reporting from the Court of Appeal in London
A British court ruled on Friday that the government could continue to house asylum seekers in a hotel in Epping, northeast of London, reversing a previous decision in a case that has come to symbolize the polarizing debate over immigration in Britain.
Asylum seekers to remain at Epping hotel after court of appeal revokes ban
Appeals court says U.K. asylum-seekers can stay at hotel - UPI.com
What the court of appeal decided, and why, in allowing asylum seekers to remain at Epping hotel
Councils press ahead with legal moves to shut asylum hotels
Epping hotel asylum seekers to remain at the Bell, court rules
Councils still plan asylum hotel legal action despite Epping ruling
Bell Hotel Epping: judgment due on asylum seekers injunction — watch live
Home Office appeals migrant ruling on Epping’s Bell Hotel
Epping migrant hotel will remain OPEN as Home Office wins court battle
Protestors gather outside Epping hotel housing asylum seekers
The British government's migration strategy was upended after a court allowed a challenge by a London-area council seeking to…
Judges say decision to allow injunction was ‘seriously flawed’ and contained several ‘errors in principle’
A hotel in Epping, England, can keep housing asylum seekers, an appeals court said Friday, overturning a lower court's injunction…
LONDON: A UK judge on Tuesday blocked asylum seekers from being housed at a hotel in a town which has witnessed violent protests,…
Ruling recharges tensions over use of hotels as Kemi Badenoch urges councils to ‘keep going’ with legal actions
Decision comes after Home Office warns injunction could put the asylum hotel scheme at risk
