The largest perils may lie in the aftermath, many experts say, just as they did in Afghanistan and Iraq.
Trump
Administration
Supported by
The largest perils may lie in the aftermath, many experts say, just as they did in Afghanistan and Iraq.
By David E. Sanger
Trump's greatest gamble: That a wounded Iran won't choose further escalation
US strike on Iran is loaded with risks for Trump
US bombing of Iran’s nuclear facilities is Trump’s biggest gamble yet as president
Trump's combative rhetoric forces Iran into a fateful, high-stakes decision
With U.S. airstrikes, Trump aims to deliver a decisive blow to a weakened Iran
Trump’s Iran strikes: risky bet on ‘peace’ or a recipe for wider war?
Iran could be more dangerous than ever. Here’s how
Nations React To U.S. Strikes On Iran With Many Calling For Diplomacy
US attacks three nuclear sites in Iran, widening conflict
No matter what Trump says, the US has gone to war – and there will be profound and lasting consequences | Simon Tisdall
President Trump is betting the United States can repel whatever retaliation Iran orders, and that it has destroyed the regime’s…
Despite Trump's warning to Tehran not to retaliate against U.S. strikes on Iranian nuclear sites, the likelihood of escalation is…
As well as retaliation risks, the president who styled himself as a "peacemaker" could face party dissent over Iran attack.
From regime change to retaliation, the BBC's Frank Gardner outlines possible outcomes of US strikes on Iran.
An official, who spoke on condition of anonymity, said the briefers described the operation to the president as a high-risk,…
Fears that decision to strike could be open-ended as Trump comes under pressure to spell out his vision for Iran
