Plaintiff hid invisible AI instructions in court filings to secretly influence automated review

A plaintiff in Connecticut embedded invisible prompt injections in court filings, formatted in 3-point white text on a white background, to manipulate a potential AI review system. Judge Spader compared the attempt to secretly tampering with a jury and revoked the plaintiff's electronic filing privileges. The court stressed that Connecticut doesn't use AI to review filings, but the intent alone was enough to warrant sanctions.

Raccontata da404media.cotomshardware.comarstechnica.comthe-decoder.com