How the under-16s social media ban could cause ‘unintended harm’

Jump to contentThank you for registeringPlease refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged inAllNewsSportCultureLifestyleScientists warn that social media restrictions for young people, like those adopted in Australia and planned by other nations, may cause unintended harm and fail to address underlying issues. Researchers argue that problematic social media use is part of a wider system involving adolescents, families, schools, and governments, meaning isolated policies are unlikely to be effective. A complete ban on social media platforms could drive young people to more private or harder-to-monitor online spaces, and Big Tech companies may adapt to circumvent new regulations. Restrictions may not affect all young people equally, potentially disadvantaging those with less support, while those with supportive families and resources might benefit more. Instead of blanket bans, scientists advocate for balanced, evidence-informed approaches that consider wider factors beyond screen time, such as social connections, industry responses, and long-term effects. In fullScientists warn of ‘unintended harm’ from teen social media banMore bulletinsThank you for registeringPlease refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in

Raccontata daindependent.co.uk