Storia in 7 fonti

Trump administration accuses Starmer of ‘egregious’ World Cup intervention

Stay up to date with notifications from The IndependentNotifications can be managed in browser preferences.AllNewsSportCultureLifestyleAndrew Giuliani, executive director of the White House’s World Cup Task Force, claimed that Sir Keir Starmer’s intervention regarding the Mexico v England kick-off time was "far more egregious" than President Trump's lobbying over Folarin Balogun’s red card. The prime minister reportedly supported the Football Association's representations to prevent Fifa from moving the Mexico v England match kick-off from 6pm to 12pm, a change that would have hindered England's preparations for the high-altitude game. President Trump contacted Fifa president Gianni Infantino to request a "review" of US striker Folarin Balogun's dismissal, which subsequently led to Fifa’s disciplinary committee suspending Balogun's ban. Giuliani argued that Starmer's intervention was more serious because the potential kick-off change was proposed for "life and safety" reasons, following three Mexican deaths after a late-night match, whereas President Trump's concern was solely about "play on the pitch." While Fifa has faced accusations of political interference, the Prime Minister’s official spokesman differentiated the two incidents, stating the PM supported practical scheduling concerns but maintained that disciplinary matters and rule applications are solely for Fifa and relevant football authorities. In fullWhite House says Keir Starmer’s England intervention ‘more egregious’ than Donald Trump’s Balogun red card callMore bulletinsThank you for registeringPlease refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in

Raccontata da