The prosecutor argued that neither Aleema nor Mubashara qualified as aggrieved persons and therefore lacked locus standi to invoke the court’s constitutional jurisdiction.

CJ-led bench notes powers of attorney signed for appeals; separate single bench removes objections to pleas challenging the couple's "solitary confinement".

The prosecutor argued that neither Aleema nor Mubashara qualified as aggrieved persons and therefore lacked locus standi to invoke the court’s constitutional jurisdiction.