The Supreme Court has upheld the Election Commission's Special Intensive Revision of electoral rolls. Activist Yogendra Yadav strongly criticizes the verdict. He claims the ruling BJP will now determine who can vote. Yadav alleges the court focused on grievance redressal instead of constitutional validity. He believes the decision authorizes the disenfranchisement of millions.

The challenge centres on whether the ECI possesses the authority to undertake what the petitioners described as a de novo reconstruction of electoral rolls | India News

The Supreme Court will rule on petitions challenging the Election Commission's electoral roll revision, impacting voter rights and citizenship verification. | India News

Bihar SIR Verdict LIVE: The Supreme Court rules on the validity of ECI’s Special Intensive Revision (SIR) exercise. Follow The Hindu for more updates.

The Supreme Court has affirmed the Election Commission's authority to conduct Special Intensive Revision of electoral rolls. This decision validates the process as constitutional…

Supreme Court upholds the decision of Election Commission of India’s (ECI) to undertake Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of voter rolls that started in Bihar. A bench led by CJI…

On Wednesday, the apex court ruled that the SIR exercise supported the constitutional requirement of free and fair elections. | India News

The Supreme Court has upheld the Election Commission's Special Intensive Revision of electoral rolls. Activist Yogendra Yadav strongly criticizes the verdict. He claims the ruling…