HomeAI · summaries
Storia in 10 fonti
Researchers who use hallucinated references to face arXiv ban
The preprint server is the latest to impose stiff penalties on authors who contribute to AI ‘slop’ — but not everyone is convinced it’s the right approach.
Confronto fonti
6 prospettive sulla stessa storiaTimeline cronologica
- ·
mashable.com
A popular academic journal is coming down hard on AI-generated submissions
ArXiv will be issuing one-year bans to authors caught submitting AI work.
- ·
heise.de
AI Papers on arXiv: Ban on first offense
The science platform is tightening its rules again: Anyone who passes off AI garbage as science will be banned – and then scrutinized more closely.
- ·
techcrunch.com
Research repository ArXiv will ban authors for a year if they let AI do all the work | TechCrunch
ArXiv is doing more to crack down on the careless use of large language models in scientific papers.
- ·
thenextweb.com
ArXiv introduces one-year ban for researchers who submit papers with unchecked AI-generated content
The preprint platform will penalise authors whose papers contain hallucinated references or leftover LLM instructions. A Lancet study found fabricated citations in biomedical…
- ·
techspot.com
ArXiv will ban researchers for a year if they submit papers with AI slop
The arXiv (pronounced "archive") team recently announced a significant update to its official code of conduct. The popular open-access repository of research papers awaiting peer…
- ·
theconversation.com
A key science publishing platform is cracking down on AI slop
AI infractions could result in a year-long ban from the arXiv system, which is an essential communication channel in many fields of research.
- ·
computerworld.com
Arxiv: Researchers who submit AI-generated junk could get 1-year suspension
A single violation might be enough to result in suspension.
- ·
nature.com
Researchers who use hallucinated references to face arXiv ban
The preprint server is the latest to impose stiff penalties on authors who contribute to AI ‘slop’ — but not everyone is convinced it’s the right approach.
- ·
sciencealert.com
'AI Slop' Is Flooding Science Publishing, And One Major Site Is Fighting Back
The preprint website arXiv has announced that researchers who have put their names to papers that included errors clearly generated by artificial intelligence (AI) will face a…
- ·
timeshighereducation.com
Ban for authors submitting AI content ‘welcome but unenforceable’
Research integrity experts commend arXiv’s crackdown on bogus AI-written citations but warn it may be impossible to police at scale
- ·
Daily briefing: Bogus citations will get you banned from arXiv
arXiv’s stance on AI-hallucinated references is a good start, but not tough enough, say some researchers. Plus, the brain’s code seems to be in constant flux and how to learn to…