Storia in 2 fonti

Ah we are back at the museum store funding the museum.

Molo agrees that OpenAI needed money for compute. He is annoyed that a “brainstorming session” is being cast as evidence that Musk wanted to abandon OpenAI’s non-profit mission.

Raccontata da

theverge.com

sharptext.net

Confronto fonti

2 prospettive sulla stessa storia

AI · summaries

theverge.comStai leggendo3 mesi fa

Ah we are back at the museum store funding the museum.

Molo agrees that OpenAI needed money for compute. He is annoyed that a “brainstorming session” is being cast as evidence that Musk wanted to abandon OpenAI’s non-profit mission.

originale

sharptext.net3 mesi fa

Elon’s OpenAI Lawsuit Is Boring and Insulting, and It’s Already a Success

On the OpenAI trial and Elon Musk telling the world the same few Sam Altman stories that everyone knows and loves.

Leggi questa versione → originale

Timeline cronologica

mercoledì 13 maggio 2026·theverge.com
We are now getting cross-examination from Musk’s lawyer.
She seems confused by a CTO not knowing what revenue had been generated. Scott noted he was not the chief revenue officer. He seemed amused.
mercoledì 13 maggio 2026·theverge.com
Live updates from Elon Musk and Sam Altman’s court battle over the future of OpenAI
Week three of Elon vs. Altman.

Ah we are back at the museum store funding the museum.

Confronto fonti

Ah we are back at the museum store funding the museum.

Elon’s OpenAI Lawsuit Is Boring and Insulting, and It’s Already a Success

Timeline cronologica

We are now getting cross-examination from Musk’s lawyer.

Live updates from Elon Musk and Sam Altman’s court battle over the future of OpenAI

Okay, it’s time for the cross of Achiam.

Museum gift shop metaphor found dead in a ditch.

Microsoft and OpenAI rest.

Molo has begun his closing statement for Elon Musk, who is in China.

I see why Molo is leaning on the spoken testimony.

Ah we are back at the museum store funding the museum.

Musk’s early money meant “a great, great deal,” Molo says. Inarguable!

Molo is now suggesting that the “crown jewels” of OpenAI are its IP.

We are back on the millions and billions of OpenAI equity that employees have interest in.

During our break, the jurors were out of the room, and the lawyers were beefing again.

Molo is now attempting to make a case against Microsoft.

For all of the very irritating testimony about “the blip,” Molo hasn’t convincingly connected it to his case.

Molo is done presenting Musk’s closing argument.

Sarah Eddy is giving the closing argument for OpenAI.

We are back from our break. William Savitt is taking it home for the OpenAI defense.

Elon’s OpenAI Lawsuit Is Boring and Insulting, and It’s Already a Success