Some highlights: * (while looking at a chart that the plaintiffs showed the jury) I paraphrase but: I don’t know how he thought his slide was a fair representation of anything, much less reality * “If he’s saying [the nonprofit] would own more of the for-profit if they hadn’t taken outside investment, that’s true, but then the pie would have been significantly smaller.” Coates would prefer 30 percent of a $200 billion than “a much larger share of a much smaller pie.” * The nonprofit has “benefitted enormously” from the for-profit “so I don’t understand his argument.”

Sam Altman testifies in landmark OpenAI trial, says Musk wanted control of company - SiliconANGLE

She seems confused by a CTO not knowing what revenue had been generated. Scott noted he was not the chief revenue officer. He seemed amused.