Storia in 4 fonti

Fairly stupid choice by Musk’s lawyers to go after Microsoft’s major decision rights.

Microsoft had an approval right on some transactions. It did not have the majority of the board. That’s even though they contributed more than 90 percent of OpenAI’s initial investments. Also, all LPs had major decision rights, Wetter testifies. So this is less control than Musk wanted for more money.

Raccontata da

lunedì 11 maggio 2026·cnbc.com
Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella takes stand in Musk v. Altman trial
Elon Musk named Microsoft as a defendant in his lawsuit against OpenAI
mercoledì 13 maggio 2026·axios.com
Sam Altman rejects Musk's "stolen charity" claims in court showdown
Altman testified in Elon Musk's case against him, OpenAI and Microsoft.

Fairly stupid choice by Musk’s lawyers to go after Microsoft’s major decision rights.

Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella takes stand in Musk v. Altman trial

Sam Altman rejects Musk's "stolen charity" claims in court showdown

Sam Altman testifies in landmark OpenAI trial, says Musk wanted control of company - SiliconANGLE

Mike Wetter for Microsoft is taking the stand now.

Musk cross. I guess we are now going to have a fight about due diligence.

Fairly stupid choice by Musk’s lawyers to go after Microsoft’s major decision rights.

Microsoft feared being too dependent on OpenAI, Musk-Altman trial testimony reveals

Molo is now suggesting that the “crown jewels” of OpenAI are its IP.

Molo is now attempting to make a case against Microsoft.

For all of the very irritating testimony about “the blip,” Molo hasn’t convincingly connected it to his case.

Eddy suggests that Musk’s donated Teslas were, effectively, bribes.

“I told you in my opening statement you wouldn’t hear very much from Microsoft, and you haven’t”