Home
Storia in 4 fonti
Starmer accuses Robbins of obstructing truth about Mandelson vetting
PM admits he made mistake in choice of ambassador as he makes high-stakes statement to parliament over scandal
- ·
theguardian.com
Keir Starmer faces ‘judgment day’ as Mandelson vetting debacle grows
As revelations mount and accusations fly, prime minister prepares for MPs’ anger and Olly Robbins’ testimony early next week
- ·
Pressure on Starmer grows over Mandelson vetting despite ousting of Foreign Office official – UK politics live
PM said he was ‘staggered’ not to have been told that Peter Mandelson had failed his security vetting before becoming ambassador to the US
- ·
Starmer would have blocked Mandelson role over vetting failure, says Lammy
Deputy prime minister says it is ‘inexplicable’ top civil servant kept Downing Street in dark
- ·
The key questions Keir Starmer must answer over Mandelson appointment
PM to give Commons statement on Monday, a day before sacked civil servant Olly Robbins tells his side of the story
- ·
Naming Mandelson as ambassador before vetting was mistake, minister says
Douglas Alexander says lessons need to be learned but he expects Keir Starmer will continue as PM
- ·
Starmer could have been told about Mandelson’s vetting failure, claims No 10 with release of briefing paper – UK politics live
Downing Street takes unusual step of releasing document ahead of PM’s Commons showdown over Mandelson scandal
- ·
Starmer to admit he inadvertently gave MPs misleading information on Mandelson
PM to tell Commons he was himself misled and would ‘never knowingly mislead parliament or the public’
- ·
thehindu.com
Embattled Starmer says he was not told Mandelson failed vetting process
Keir Starmer faces intense scrutiny from MPs over the Mandelson scandal amid growing calls for his resignation.
- ·
bbc.com
Keir Starmer: Officials deliberately withheld Mandelson vetting result from me
The PM tells the Commons that if he had known the peer failed security vetting he would not have been appointed.
- ·
Starmer accuses Robbins of obstructing truth about Mandelson vetting
PM admits he made mistake in choice of ambassador as he makes high-stakes statement to parliament over scandal
- ·
Will Olly Robbins’ testimony jeopardise Keir Starmer’s defence?
What questions will sacked head of the Foreign Office be asked, and what might they mean for the PM’s future?
- ·
Fired former U.K. official says he felt political pressure to approve Mandelson as U.S. Ambassador
Former U.K. official claims political pressure influenced Mandelson's ambassador appointment despite security concerns, sparking controversy for Prime Minister Starmer.
- ·
Robbins v Starmer: the key points they disagree on over Mandelson vetting
Sacked civil servant says it was right not to tell PM that Mandelson had failed vetting – a view Starmer rejects
- ·
elpais.com
El alto funcionario cesado por Starmer asegura que el Gobierno británico presionó para acelerar el nombramiento de Mandelson
Oliver Robbins acusa al primer ministro de querer colocar en otra embajada a su exdirector de Comunicaciones
- ·
Mandelson vetting row: Starmer v Robbins blame game deepens - The Latest
The Foreign Office chief sacked over the Peter Mandelson security vetting scandal has finally given his side of the story in an explosive appearance before MPs. Lucy Hough speaks…
- ·
The Guardian view on Starmer and Mandelson: when process follows power | Editorial
Editorial: Olly Robbins exposed a deeper failure: when the prime minister’s decision came first, security vetting was left to catch up after the fact
- ·
Olly Robbins’ account of Mandelson vetting piles pressure on Starmer
Sacked civil servant tells select committee of ‘pressure’ to give clearance and ‘dismissive’ attitude to vetting
- ·
Robbins says officials considered withholding Mandelson vetting files from parliament
Sacked civil servant acknowledges ‘debate’ about release of documents after question about alleged ‘cover-up’
- ·
How Olly Robbins’ knightly charm glossed over burning questions on Mandelson vetting
Former Foreign Office top official’s evidence raises stark issues with ‘the system’ he was seeking to defend