Stay up to date with notifications from The IndependentNotifications can be managed in browser preferences.AllNewsSportCultureLifestyleLabour peer Baroness Shami Chakrabarti has criticised the government's decision to proscribe Palestine Action as a terrorist organisation, warning it could lead to increased public support for the group. Her concerns intensified after over 500 people were arrested in central London for displaying items in support of a proscribed organisation during a weekend march. Baroness Chakrabarti argued that acts like criminal damage, such as spraying paint, do not equate to terrorism, and urged the government to “think again” on the ban.Civil liberties groups, along with cross-party MPs, have condemned the mass arrests as disproportionate and an excessive use of counter-terrorism powers. The Home Secretary and Downing Street have defended the ban, saying that Palestine Action is a violent organisation responsible for significant injury and extensive criminal damage.In fullPalestine Action terror ban risks ‘I am Spartacus’ moment, Labour peer warnsThank you for registeringPlease refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in

Government defends decision to proscribe protest group after mass arrests at a demonstration in Westminster over the weekend

The law that saw hundreds arrested for supporting the group on Saturday should be changed, Lord Sumption says

Baroness Chakrabarti urged the government to ‘think again’, warning that the ban on the group may lead to more people, not fewer, taking to the streets to support them

LONDON: Senior figures in the UK’s ruling Labour Party are sounding the alarm over the government’s banning of the group Palestine Action. It comes after hundreds of people were…

Stay up to date with notifications from The IndependentNotifications can be managed in browser preferences.AllNewsSportCultureLifestyleLabour peer Baroness Shami Chakrabarti has…

The battle over the Palestine Action ban now feels as much a political and PR clash as a legal one.