Gen Muhoozi Kainerugaba, the son of the Ugandan president, said the nation were no longer taking part in the Duke's Invictus Games due to the ‘Harry-Meghan nonsense’22:04, 09 Sep 2026Updated 22:25, 09 Sep 2026Uganda's decision to withdraw from Prince Harry's Invictus Games is a 'consequence' of the King's cutting letter on the Duke and Duchess of Sussex's royal status, it has been claimed.‌Buckingham Palace issued the 'guidance' on the monarch's behalf on Monday, declaring in no uncertain terms that the couple have not returned to the UK as working royals.‌A spokesman or the Sussexes quickly hit back at the announcement, claiming: "We were a little surprised not to have been told about this in advance" with the publication of the letter said to be catching the returning Sussexes off-guard.‌Uganda today are no longer going to be taking part in the Games, the country’s military chief has said, out of respect for King Charles amid division over the “Harry-Meghan nonsense”.But a source linked to the Sussex's camp told ITV: "Intended or unintended, this is clearly a consequence of the Lord Chamberlain’s guidance regarding the Duke and Duchess of Sussex that was rushed out without consultation on Monday.‌“Sadly, the only people who will suffer are the Invictus Games competitors.”Gen Muhoozi Kainerugaba, son of the Ugandan president, made the withdrawal announcement in a post on social media.‌Kainerugaba wrote: “In order not to be construed as being opposed to His Majesty King Charles III of the United Kingdom, whom we deeply revere, Uganda hereby withdraws from the Invictus Games. We shall not participate in anything that does not have His Majesty’s approval.”General Kainerugaba, speaking to The Times, said he made the decision to withdraw Uganda from the Invictus Games due to his support for King Charles.He said: "I have factions in the Ministry of Defence that support that Harry-Meghan nonsense. I had to quash it straight away. I support the monarch. Period."‌The King issued a letter to "senior stakeholders" on Monday where he has made it clear that - despite being back in the UK - his son and Meghan should be considered "private citizens".In a firm letter statement on his behalf, it stated that the Sussexes' should not use their HRH styles, which are still in abeyance, and that they "do not represent the sovereign" while out making public appearances.Article continues belowThe guidance was sent under the King's instruction by his most senior official, the Lord Chamberlain, to offer clarity over Harry and Meghan's royal status after requests for guidance. It has been issued to those in government, the military and lord lieutenants up and down the country.In the run up to the Sussexes' return to Britain, the King was said to be glad to be able to spend more time with the family, but remained adamant they would not be working royals and there was no half-in, half-out option.