A juror who voted to acquit Lindsay Clancy sensationally admitted that she changed her vote after being swayed during hostile deliberations with 'big personalities' in the room.The anonymous juror, who is the fourth to come forward following the murder trial, told CBS Boston that she had not kept up with the high-profile case before being summoned to court in Massachusetts.She said her initial stance was to convict Clancy - and despite eventually voting to acquit the killer mother, the juror admitted she 'maybe still believes' Clancy should go to prison. The juror said: 'Originally, I felt that she was guilty and she was criminally responsible for it.' 'Maybe I still believe that [Clancy is guilty], in a certain way,' she admitted. Clancy's murder case for killing her three young children ended in a mistrial after the jury was deadlocked 11-1, with one holdout who refused to acquit her. The anonymous juror said that the lone holdout who refused to vote not guilty clashed with their fellow jurors almost immediately, and that 'the majority of the room was trying to sway that person from the very beginning.'She said she will 'defend that individual' for standing his ground during the tense deliberations, which allegedly included shouting that could be heard from other rooms inside the court.The fourth juror spoke out soon after three others, foreperson Roni Carlson, Kellie Farina and Paula Devlin, came forward to publicly condemn the holdout who refused to change his vote.