August is the quietest month on the NHL calendar, which makes it an ideal time for us hockey writers to dive into passion projects. One of the highlights comes from The Athletic’s Corey Pronman, who released his organizational pipeline rankings earlier this week. It’s a massive undertaking that offers evaluations of the best under-23 players from every team and fuels debate from fans in every NHL city.As a New York Rangers beat reporter, I’m naturally drawn to Corey’s analysis of the New York prospects. He placed them 18th overall among the 32 teams, which represents a modest step up from last year’s No. 24, and jives with other opinions I’ve heard around the league. Many of the names on his list landed about where I thought they’d be, but there was one that caught my attention — and that of many Blueshirts fans. Gabe Perreault, whom colleague Scott Wheeler recently ranked 19th among all NHL drafted prospects, fell to sixth on Corey’s Rangers-specific list and didn’t even crack his list of the top 156 U-23 players.That’s a major discrepancy over a player our two prospect writers have repeatedly disagreed on. I find myself leaning in Scott’s direction on this one, which made me want to hear more from Corey about how he arrived at his polarizing opinion. Being the good sport that he is, Corey agreed to answer some of my questions and engage in a little point-counterpoint exercise for readers.Enjoy!The Sharks have the NHL’s best prospect pipelineCorey Pronman and Max BultmanVincent Z. Mercogliano: I should mention at the top that colleague Peter Baugh and I are working on our own Rangers prospect rankings, which will begin rolling out Aug. 24. I’ve done this exercise for eight years running and only consider players who maintain rookie eligibility and are yet to reach their second contract, which puts Perreault out of the running. But he was our No. 1 prospect in the organization last year and would have landed no lower than No. 2 if he had been included this year.That’s because, in both my opinion and that of several scouts we’ve polled, Perreault clearly rises above the rest of New York’s prospects in terms of offensive aptitude and production. That and overall center depth are the biggest deficiencies in the Rangers’ system, with Perreault representing their best — and perhaps only — chance for a top-six forward with skill and creativity. (Quite frankly, the Rangers are in trouble if he doesn’t hit that mark.) He still owns the U.S. National Team Development Program single-season record with 132 points (53 goals and 79 assists) in 63 games during his 2022-23 draft year, and while that came playing alongside fellow 2023 first-round picks Ryan Leonard and Will Smith, we’ve seen Perreault continue to score at every level: Boston College, AHL Hartford and now the Rangers.I viewed his finish to last season as proof of concept, reducing the amount of projection needed when comparing him to other prospects. It took a little time to adjust to the NHL level, but once he got his bearings and was given uninterrupted ice time on New York’s top line with Alexis Lafrenière and Mika Zibanejad, his playmaking instincts bubbled to the surface. From March 2 on, Perreault collected 19 points (nine goals and 10 assists) in 23 games, including three game-winning goals. That came as a 20-year-old rookie (he turned 21 after the season) and seemed to leave the development arrow pointing firmly up, which leads me to my first series of questions for Corey.
How should we evaluate Rangers forward Gabe Perreault’s development?
Mercogliano sees Perreault as one of the Rangers' very best prospects. Pronman ranks him sixth. Why the discrepancy?






