What is Tana Mongeau and Clavicular’s feud? Podcast remarks explained (Image via Getty)Tana Mongeau has reportedly decided against filming a podcast with streamer and influencer Clavicular, despite previously showing interest in the idea. Her hesitation centers on what she described as an unsettling side of his behavior, particularly toward women. In comments shared online, Mongeau said messages from several people warning her about Clavicular changed how she viewed the proposed collaboration and left her questioning whether she would feel safe around him.Why Tana Mongeau is refusing a Clavicular podcastMongeau said she received an unusual number of warnings after people encouraged her to connect with Clavicular. Rather than dismissing them as internet drama, she said the repeated messages made her stop and reconsider the situation.“I in one day received 8 text messages, 8 text messages from 8 different people of all different walks of life saying like ‘Clav hit me up he’s just really tryna make things work. This could be a moment let me know if you want me to connect...’ and I’m just like, Clavicular has a hit out on me. After text number 4, it’s like what are you doing...”The comment appears to describe Mongeau's reaction to receiving multiple messages about Clavicular rather than an allegation that he actually placed a “hit” on her. The language shows how overwhelmed she felt by the sudden wave of outreach.Her concerns also appear tied to Clavicular's public image and controversies surrounding his online behavior. Recent coverage has focused on his relationship with Lily Snyder, including a livestreamed breakup that drew widespread attention. Tana previously criticized the way the relationship played out and questioned whether online attention and revenue could influence how creators treat people.That background helps explain why a potential podcast appearance now appears much less appealing to her.What Tana Mongeau said about Clavicular's behavior toward womenMongeau's strongest concern was not simply whether the podcast would become controversial. She said she was genuinely worried about how Clavicular might behave during the recording.“The things that he says and does not only to himself, but specifically to women, are so shocking and so jarring... There’s such a scary other side factor to me... Why do I feel like he would hit me on the pod?”That statement is an expression of Mongeau's fear, not evidence that Clavicular has threatened or assaulted her. It is an important distinction as the discussion spreads online.The proposed podcast also highlights a larger problem for creators who turn internet controversy into content. A provocative guest can generate views, clips and engagement, but the potential payoff does not remove concerns about personal boundaries or safety.For Mongeau, the calculation now appears simple. Whatever interest she once had in sitting across from Clavicular has been replaced by uncertainty about what could happen once the cameras start rolling.Her comments have therefore shifted attention away from whether the two influencers would make compelling podcast content and toward a more serious question: when does an internet collaboration become too uncomfortable to justify the attention it might generate?