Candace Owens (Image via Getty)Candace Owens and political commentator Andrew Wilson have taken their disagreement over the Charlie Kirk murder case into public view, turning a debate invitation into a heated exchange on social media. At the center of the dispute is Tyler Robinson, the suspect in the case. Owens has firmly defended her belief that Robinson was framed, while Wilson insists she should publicly defend that position in a formal debate.Candace Owens stands by Tyler Robinson "patsy" claimThe disagreement escalated after Wilson argued that Owens had already made a clear claim about the case and should be prepared to defend it publicly.He wrote:“All evening the Candace Owens people have been saying she makes no claims so she doesn’t have to defend any. They claim I said there was overwhelming evidence for the prosecution of Robinson which is true I said that so I meed to defend it.”Wilson continued:“However, Candace did make a reverse claim. She said there is overwhelming evidence Robinson was set up by the feds as a patsy. So I will take the position that the evidence is more compelling that Tyler was a lone shooter not set up by the feds. She takes the position of her claim, which she says has overwhelming evidence he was a patsy put there by the feds. If she agrees, then we are all set.”Owens responded by making it clear that she had no intention of backing away from her position."Geez, he is still going. Yes, Andrew. I firmly believe there is evidence Tyler Robinson was set up as a patsy and I am more than happy to defend that claim. Can we now take this offline and organize the debate officially. This is just getting exhausting, which I think is your intention. Yes or no? We aren’t doing this all day again.”Andrew Wilson and Candace Owens move closer to a public debateOwens reinforced her stance with another message, removing any doubt about where she stands.“And to be extra clear—- yes, yes, yes I accept the claim there is more evidence Tyler Robinson was set up as a patsy than evidence that he committed this crime. I am willing to defend, gladly, with the facts of the case presented thus far.”The exchange has intensified interest in a potential public debate between the two commentators. Reports indicate that Wilson has claimed he offered Owens $300,000 to participate, adding even more attention to the ongoing dispute.The discussion comes as the Charlie Kirk murder case continues to generate widespread public interest and online debate. While Owens argues that the available evidence points toward Robinson being framed, Wilson maintains that the evidence more strongly supports the conclusion that Robinson acted alone.At this stage, neither side has changed its position. Instead, both appear willing to defend their respective arguments in a formal debate if arrangements are finalized.Until that happens, the social media exchange has become another high-profile chapter in the wider discussion surrounding one of the most closely watched criminal cases in recent months. As attention remains fixed on the legal proceedings, the proposed Owens-Wilson debate has emerged as a separate flashpoint, drawing supporters and critics from both sides while keeping the controversy firmly in the public spotlight.