partner content
The debate about whether enterprises need an internal platform is over. Google’s 2025 DORA research found that 90 percent of organizations now report using an internal platform, and 76 percent have established dedicated platform teams. The question for IT leaders is no longer “should we build a platform?” It’s “will the platform we’ve built survive what’s coming?”The honest answer for most IT organizations is no — not without work. The platform you stood up over the past few years was designed for human developers shipping containerized apps at a human pace. That world is gone. Many forces have piled onto platforms in the last two years, and together they are exposing the cracks.At the base of every crack is infrastructure — the developer-centric substrate that was never designed to provision GPUs on demand, govern AI agents, or enforce cost control at the moment of provisioning.Start with the obvious one. Most developers are now using AI coding assistants. AI-assisted development has become mainstream, dramatically increasing the volume of code that organizations can generate and review. The bottleneck has moved. It’s no longer about writing code — it’s about delivering it. Your pipelines were never sized for that throughput, and the developer’s job has quietly changed from author to reviewer and orchestrator of machine-generated work.Then there’s a brand-new kind of user knocking on the door: the AI agent. This is the non-human persona platform teams have increasingly had to design for over the last decade. Agents need authentication, token usage regulation and management at an organization and user level, GPU allocation, MCP compatibility, scoped permissions, non-human identity, audit logging, and hard guardrails on what they’re allowed to do. Most platforms have no native answer for any of it.Cost is the third pressure. As per Broadcom’s Private Cloud Outlook 2026 study - 97 percent of IT leaders believe some of their public cloud spend is wasted, and 52 percent estimate that waste exceeds 25 percent of their total public cloud budget. AI infrastructure makes it dramatically worse. GPU instances, inference endpoints, and training jobs dwarf traditional spend. On top sits the token cost of every prompt and retry — a category most cost-reporting tools simply can’t see. Retrospective FinOps, the monthly review and quarterly cleanup sprint, can’t catch a misconfigured AI workload that burns through budget overnight.Privacy, security and sovereignty round out the list. AI introduces new vast attack surfaces — shadow AI sprawl, prompt injection, model poisoning, inference data leaks — that no SAST or DAST scan in your pipeline was built to detect. Meanwhile the EU AI Act, US executive orders, and data residency rules keep adding compliance requirements.Platform Engineering 2.0 Evolution, not a RebuildHere’s the part worth hearing clearly: none of this means tearing up what you’ve built. The foundations — Platform as Product, golden paths, shift-left security, self-service Internal Developer Platforms (IDPs) — still hold. The discipline doesn’t reset at each phase. It evolves. What’s described as Platform Engineering 2.0 is an extension of those foundations across five pillars, not a do-over.
