You know that feeling when you ship code and three days later you're staring at a Slack message saying "hey, did you consider X?" Yeah, I lived that life too. Now I don't.
Here's the thing: code review tools show you syntax problems. Claude shows you logic problems. Architecture issues. Performance gotchas. The stuff that makes you go "oh crap, I didn't think about that" at 2 AM.
The Problem With Traditional Code Review
Your team's doing their best. PR comments are helpful. But let's be honest: by the time someone reviews your code, they're context-switching from six other things. You get surface-level feedback. Typos, naming conventions, maybe a "consider using a Set here instead of an Array" comment if you're lucky.
The deeper stuff? The stuff that bites you in prod? That slips through because it's not visibly broken—it's just... fragile.
