Skip to Content Subscribe Our Offers My Account Manage My Subscriptions FAQ Newsletters Canada Canadian True Crime Canadian Politics Health World Israel & Middle East Financial Post NP Comment Longreads Puzzmo Diversions Comics NP News Quiz New York Times Crossword Horoscopes Life Eating & Drinking Style Sponsored Play for Ontario Travel Travel Canada Travel USA Travel International Cruises Travel Essentials Culture Books Celebrity Movies Music Theatre Television Business Essentials Advice Lives Told Tails Told Shopping Buy Canadian Home Living Outdoor Living Kitchen & Dining Tech Style & Beauty Personal Care Entertainment & Hobbies Gift Guide Travel Guide Amazon Prime Day Deals Savings National Post Store More Sports Hockey Baseball Basketball Football Soccer Golf Tennis Driving Vehicle Research Reviews News Gear Guide Obituaries Place an Obituary Place an In Memoriam Classifieds Place an Ad Celebrations Working Business Ads Archives Healthing Epaper Manage Print Subscription Profile Settings My Subscriptions Saved Articles My Offers Newsletters Customer Service FAQ Newsletters Canada World Financial Post NP Comment Longreads Puzzmo Diversions Life Shopping Epaper Manage Print Subscription HomeNP CommentChris Selley: Why so shy about running for Parliament, Avi Lewis?For the NDP, there are two theoretically winnable byelections coming up. The party leader should want to run in oneLast updated 29 minutes ago You can save this article by registering for free here. Or sign-in if you have an account.Avi Lewis speaks to reporters in foyer of the House of Commons in June. But the New Democratic Party leader doesn't seem interested in winning a seat in the building. Photo by Blair Gable/PostmediaThere has been minor hubbub this week down at the Laurentian Tennis and Raquet Club — not a real place — over a new Abacus Data poll suggesting a generational divide among Canadians when it comes to their most basic views on democracy. Among poll respondents aged 60-plus, 78 per cent felt “democracy is always preferable to any other kind of government.” Among 18-to-29-year-olds, it was just 43 per cent. In that same younger cohort, fully 13 per cent agreed that “for someone like me, it doesn’t matter what kind of government we have.”Enjoy the latest local, national and international news.Exclusive articles by Conrad Black, Barbara Kay and others. Plus, special edition NP Platformed and First Reading newsletters and virtual events.Unlimited online access to National Post.National Post ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition to view on any device, share and comment on.Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword.Support local journalism.Enjoy the latest local, national and international news.Exclusive articles by Conrad Black, Barbara Kay and others. Plus, special edition NP Platformed and First Reading newsletters and virtual events.Unlimited online access to National Post.National Post ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition to view on any device, share and comment on.Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword.Support local journalism.Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience.Access articles from across Canada with one account.Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments.Enjoy additional articles per month.Get email updates from your favourite authors.Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience.Access articles from across Canada with one accountShare your thoughts and join the conversation in the commentsEnjoy additional articles per monthGet email updates from your favourite authorsSign In or Create an AccountorThose certainly aren’t encouraging numbers. But I don’t think they’re necessarily evidence of some failure of civics education, as former cabinet minister Jason Kenney and several commentators suggested. I thought Conservative Senator Leo Housakos hit much closer to the mark, arguing the findings should be “a red flag to all of us who play a role in public institutions that we need to be better.”The National Post newsletter that doesn’t hold back, giving readers the unvarnished truth on media, politics and culture.By signing up, you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc.A welcome email is on its way. If you don't see it, please check your junk folder.The next issue of Right? will soon be in your inbox.We encountered an issue signing you up. Please try againIndeed, these results really shouldn’t be surprising. Your average Canadian aged 60-and-over has simply had it much better than their kids and grandkids. Governments talk a reasonably big game about fixing things as basic as housing affordability, but progress has been maddeningly slow and piecemeal.Younger Canadians should be hacked off. And they are not wrong to perceive that it often doesn’t make a huge difference who’s in charge in Ottawa or their provincial capital, or even what democratic system (or otherwise) they operate under. Problems either get solved or they don’t.That doesn’t explain why federal NDP Leader Avi Lewis doesn’t seem super-interested in running for a seat in the House of Commons, however. He’s not going to solve anyone’s problems without one.Of six forthcoming byelections, one is in an existing NDP riding — Rosemont—La Petite-Patrie, the party’s last redoubt in Quebec, which Alexandre Boulerice has vacated in order to run provincially. Another is Beaches—East York, where the Liberals have been dominant for more than a decade. But the NDP has held it in the past, and if there’s a riding where Lewis’s name-recognition and resumé might make a dent, that could be one. He hasn’t many of those to choose from.Instead, reportedly, former Toronto city councillor Mike Layton — son of late NDP leader Jack Layton — is eyeing the party’s nomination in Beaches—East York. Name recognition could take Layton much further in a centre-left Toronto riding than Lewis, I suspect. Jack Layton is still fresh in the minds of most core New Democrats, and he knew how to expand the party’s appeal.But Mike Layton isn’t the party leader. He could have run for the leadership, and didn’t. One can understand Lewis’s hesitation about strong-arming a sitting Dipper out of a safe seat in British Columbia. But not running at all is a very odd look from a leader who clearly fancies himself quite an orator and who, by rights, should be haranguing Prime Minister Mark Carney every opportunity he gets on the floor of the House.Is that not the job? I sure thought that was the job, even if Abacus suggests kids aren’t so sure. Most everyone else seems to think so, federally at least. Before Carney did it, John Turner was the last Liberal leader to win the party leadership (and the Prime Minister’s Office) without a seat in the House. They both won seats in the ensuing general elections, as a matter of correctly perceived necessity.On the Conservative side of the aisle, Pierre Poilievre certainly saw the imperative to get himself back in the House of Commons after losing his Ottawa-area riding last year. And quite rightly. Question period is rarely an edifying spectacle — donot take children there! — but Parliament is where politicians like Poilievre and Lewis, if they’re worth their fight-for-the-little-guy bona fides, should be making their case against this elbows-akimbo Liberal government.For all its travails and dramatic decline in the polls, the federal NDP has gotten one thing right in recent years: It doesn’t generally kick out a leader after a single election loss (unless that leader is Tom Mulcair). None of Stéphane Dion, Michael Ignatieff, Andrew Scheer or Erin O’Toole got a second chance with the Liberals and Conservatives, respectively. Poilievre has bucked that minor trend (so far) on the Conservative side of the aisle — and that’s a party whose supporters actually expect and want to win elections.If Jagmeet Singh could hang on to the NDP leadership as long as he did, even as he steered the party near oblivion, Lewis surely needn’t fear being defenestrated should he contest Beaches—East York and lose a reasonably competitive byelection fight. He’d be on the news, quite apart from anything else. Certainly, Lewis can’t hope to do any better than Singh did without a seat in the Commons. And if he doesn’t think he can win one, or that it’s even worth trying ASAP, perhaps the party didn’t make the wisest choice.National Post cselley@postmedia.com Join the Conversation This website uses cookies to personalize your content (including ads), and allows us to analyze our traffic. Read more about cookies here. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.