Divergence escalates the wrong population: unanimous misses auto-pass
Agent Determinism Illusions (Part 7)
Where this fits: This part does not continue Part 13's probe-vs-prose thread. It returns to Part 6's L2→L3 escalation rule — Dipankar's move of treating vote disagreement as the human-review signal. Alexey Spinov's follow-up comment says that signal points at the wrong population. Two experiments check whether he is right, and what to put in the tripwire instead.
Part 6 drew this control flow:
L2 multi-perspective votes
