Skip to Content Subscribe Our Offers My Account Manage My Subscriptions FAQ Newsletters Canada Canadian True Crime Canadian Politics Health World Israel & Middle East Financial Post NP Comment Longreads Puzzmo Diversions Comics NP News Quiz New York Times Crossword Horoscopes Life Eating & Drinking Style Sponsored Play for Ontario Travel Travel Canada Travel USA Travel International Cruises Travel Essentials Culture Books Celebrity Movies Music Theatre Television Business Essentials Advice Lives Told Tails Told Shopping Buy Canadian Home Living Outdoor Living Kitchen & Dining Tech Style & Beauty Personal Care Entertainment & Hobbies Gift Guide Travel Guide Amazon Prime Day Deals Savings National Post Store More Sports Hockey Baseball Basketball Football Soccer Golf Tennis Driving Vehicle Research Reviews News Gear Guide Obituaries Place an Obituary Place an In Memoriam Classifieds Place an Ad Celebrations Working Business Ads Archives Healthing Epaper Manage Print Subscription Profile Settings My Subscriptions Saved Articles My Offers Newsletters Customer Service FAQ Newsletters Canada World Financial Post NP Comment Longreads Puzzmo Diversions Life Shopping Epaper Manage Print Subscription HomeNP CommentRobin Skies: Conservative purity testing is a race to the bottomThe Conservative movement gains nothing by constantly purity testing everyone it perceives as an enemyLast updated 38 minutes ago You can save this article by registering for free here. Or sign-in if you have an account.A man is silhouetted walking past a Conservative party logo at a 2018 convention in Halifax. " Photo by Darren CalabreseIn Canada, the conservative movement is mired in a crippling problem: the destructive, on-again, off-again habit of purity testing, whether ideological or otherwise.Enjoy the latest local, national and international news.Exclusive articles by Conrad Black, Barbara Kay and others. Plus, special edition NP Platformed and First Reading newsletters and virtual events.Unlimited online access to National Post.National Post ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition to view on any device, share and comment on.Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword.Support local journalism.Enjoy the latest local, national and international news.Exclusive articles by Conrad Black, Barbara Kay and others. Plus, special edition NP Platformed and First Reading newsletters and virtual events.Unlimited online access to National Post.National Post ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition to view on any device, share and comment on.Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword.Support local journalism.Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience.Access articles from across Canada with one account.Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments.Enjoy additional articles per month.Get email updates from your favourite authors.Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience.Access articles from across Canada with one accountShare your thoughts and join the conversation in the commentsEnjoy additional articles per monthGet email updates from your favourite authorsSign In or Create an AccountorThe phenomenon is hardly new in politics. There have always been people who see politics as a vehicle for asserting tribal status rather than pursuing civic service. That impulse is now beginning to animate parts of the Conservative Party’s base to a damaging degree.“Secret Liberal” is a term thrown around more often than I care to count, used as an insult against those who are not part of this or that club within the party and the broader movement. Whatever the club, its members insist that they are the only true, ideologically pure Conservatives and the only arbiters of the change needed to get Canada back on track toward a better future.The National Post newsletter that doesn’t hold back, giving readers the unvarnished truth on media, politics and culture.By signing up, you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc.A welcome email is on its way. If you don't see it, please check your junk folder.The next issue of Right? will soon be in your inbox.We encountered an issue signing you up. Please try againThese same supposedly ideologically pure Conservatives justify their civil wars against internal rivals by cooking up grand conspiracies that are somehow always aimed at them in their beleaguered struggle.If any of this sounds familiar, it is probably because this resembles the ideologically captured language that has historically animated leftist revolutionary movements since Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels published The Communist Manifesto.Normally, this would not be concerning, as all political movements struggle at times to overcome their most self-immolating instincts. Unfortunately for the Conservative Party of Canada, federal Conservative leader Pierre Poilievre has decided to dabble in the world of purity testing himself.During an appearance at the Calgary Stampede, Poilievre congratulated his friend and former colleague Kerry-Lynne Findlay, saying she was “fresh off a big win against Liberal lobbyists from out east.”This, of course, is a reference to her narrow victory over Caroline Elliott in the recent B.C. Conservative Party leadership race.In part, Poilievre was likely referring to Caroline Elliott’s campaign manager, Kory Teneycke, a political rival who has criticized him. Herein lies the problem: by purity testing his political rivals, Poilievre made the Conservative tent a little smaller.He did so not only by casting suspicion on a senior Ontario Progressive Conservative campaign operative, but also by attacking, whether intentionally or not, Caroline Elliott and her supporters, including several of his own former staff members.Among Poilievre’s former staff involved with Elliott’s campaign were Katy Merrifield, who had served as his director of communications, and Anthony Koch, who was his national campaign spokesperson during the 2022 leadership race. Elliott’s team also included Jeff Ballingall, the founder of Canada Proud.To top it all off, he did all of this while legitimizing the worst instincts of the Conservative base.None of this will help the movement push its ideas forward, nor will it help the Conservative Party of Canada form government.Ultimately, purity testing does nothing but push people out of the movement and into the arms of opponents who are willing to invite them in.At its core, purity testing is irrational, because nobody is truly pure in their beliefs or perfectly consistent in their identity; people are inherently complex and often contradictory.Moreover, “conservatism” in Canada is not exactly well-defined. To be a “true conservative” means very little without more context. This is why the movement in Canada has broadly been about building coalitions around shared principles.These shared principles include support for free-market economics, respect for social conservatism, free speech, smaller government, nationalism and more.The Conservative Party exists because the old Reformers in the West and the Progressive Conservatives of the East understood that, to take on the Liberal machine, they needed to put their differences aside and work together.When the leader of the official opposition decides to take petty potshots at political rivals who are also important pillars within the big blue tent, he risks unraveling the entire movement.The Conservative movement gains nothing by constantly purity testing everyone it perceives as an enemy.Why? Because, while we keep scrutinizing members of our own camp and searching for flaws in their ideological positions, Mark Carney keeps inviting MPs, influencers, organizers and members of the general public into his coalition.We must not abandon our principles. On the contrary, we should redouble our commitment to what we believe in, but we should do it in a way that keeps people in the tent instead of shoving them out.It is normal to be critical of a person’s leadership when warranted; that calls for open debate and the challenging of ideas. However, for the love of all that is holy, people who disagree only marginally within the movement cannot keep smearing each other as covert “Liberals.”This is toxic not only because it is dismissive at a basic level and meant to shut down an opponent, but also because it suggests that many people no longer know what the word “liberal” means.How many stories have you heard from people who joined the movement because their left-leaning friends pushed them out of social circles? In 2016, that dynamic became a major political trend during one of the first peaks of “wokeness,” and today some people inside or adjacent to the Conservative Party are driven by the same spirit.Purity testing is a death spiral for political movements. If we’re not careful, we will be hearing stories about how people did not leave the right; the right left them.National Post Join the Conversation This website uses cookies to personalize your content (including ads), and allows us to analyze our traffic. Read more about cookies here. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.