Skip to Content News Archives Economy Energy Oil & Gas Renewables Electric Vehicles Mining Commodities Agriculture Real Estate Mortgages Mortgage Rates Finance Banking Insurance Fintech Cryptocurrency Work Wealth Smart Money Wealth Management Investor Personal Finance Family Finance Retirement Taxes High Net Worth FP Comment Executive Women Puzzmo Newsletters Financial Times Business Essentials More Innovation Information Technology FP500 Podcasts Small Business Lives Told Tails Told Shopping Financial Post Store Obituaries Place a Notice Advertising Advertising With Us Advertising Solutions Postmedia Ad Manager Sponsorship Requests Classifieds Place a Classifieds ad Working Profile Settings My Subscriptions Saved Articles My Offers Newsletters Customer Service FAQ News Economy Energy Mining Real Estate Finance Work Wealth Investor FP Comment Executive Women Puzzmo Newsletters Financial Times Business Essentials HomeFP CommentOpinion: OSFI would do a good job even better with a board modelThe superintendent of financial institutions has too many responsibilities. They need to be spread over a group rather than one personLast updated 27 minutes ago You can save this article by registering for free here. Or sign-in if you have an account.Accountability under a single head is unambiguous, and decisions are made quickly. But these are arguments for designing a board with care, not for clinging to the current structure. Photo by PETER J. THOMPSON/PostmediaThe Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions (OSFI), established in 1987, is the federal regulator that oversees the safety and soundness of our banks and insurers. It has helped build a prudential framework that is admired around the world. When the global financial system buckled in 2008, Canada’s stood, with no need of direct financial support for failed institutions.Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada.Exclusive articles from Barbara Shecter, Joe O'Connor, Gabriel Friedman, and others.Daily content from Financial Times, the world's leading global business publication.Unlimited online access to read articles from Financial Post, National Post and 15 news sites across Canada with one account.National Post ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition to view on any device, share and comment on.Daily puzzles, including the New York Times Crossword.Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada.Exclusive articles from Barbara Shecter, Joe O'Connor, Gabriel Friedman and others.Daily content from Financial Times, the world's leading global business publication.Unlimited online access to read articles from Financial Post, National Post and 15 news sites across Canada with one account.National Post ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition to view on any device, share and comment on.Daily puzzles, including the New York Times Crossword.Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience.Access articles from across Canada with one account.Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments.Enjoy additional articles per month.Get email updates from your favourite authors.Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience.Access articles from across Canada with one accountShare your thoughts and join the conversation in the commentsEnjoy additional articles per monthGet email updates from your favourite authorsSign In or Create an AccountorUnlike in other countries, however, OSFI concentrates sole responsibility for prudential regulation and supervision in one person. That’s an arrangement almost no comparable regulator would choose today, and it hasn’t been examined in nearly 30 years. We want to be clear: that’s an observation about design, not a criticism of any superintendent. The case for modernizing OSFI’s governance is, not that the institution has failed, but that the world it was built for no longer exists.Get the latest headlines, breaking news and columns.By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc.A welcome email is on its way. If you don't see it, please check your junk folder.The next issue of Top Stories will soon be in your inbox.We encountered an issue signing you up. Please try againConsider how far OSFI’s reach now extends. Its mortgage stress test, which gauges whether homebuyers could handle higher rates, shapes how much house Canadians can afford. At the moment, that single rule, with effects felt at kitchen tables across the country, ultimately rests on one person’s judgment.Since its establishment, the risks OSFI manages have outgrown the capital-and-credit toolkit of traditional supervision. Its new integrity and security powers address threats like foreign interference. Then there are intensifying cyber threats, physical and transition risks of climate change, and the growing call to loosen capital requirements to spur business lending. Each demands trade-offs between stability, competitiveness, resilience and public confidence that no single person, however able, should be left to weigh alone.Our recommendation is straightforward: move OSFI from a single-head model to a multi-member structure, such as an independent board of directors, supported by advisory councils with expertise in fast-moving domains like cybersecurity and AI.This is not a leap of faith. OSFI’s peers already operate this way. The U.K., Australia and Switzerland all use multi-member governance. Here in Canada in 2019 Ontario created the Financial Services Regulatory Authority (FSRA) around an independent board. With its single superintendent, OSFI is increasingly the outlier.The board we propose resembles those already in place at the Ontario Securities Commission and FSRA. Its role would be strategic oversight. It would provide independent advice and oversee the superintendent — approving the budget and policies and challenging whether OSFI is pursuing the right priorities. The superintendent, in turn, would remain responsible for running OSFI’s operations and for executing prudential decisions, like setting the domestic stability buffer, which obliges the largest banks to hold a capital cushion against systemic risks. The division is deliberate. The board would govern and the superintendent supervise.The superintendent would be accountable to the board, which in turn reports to the minister of finance. As at FSRA, the board chair would be the formal link to government and accountable for OSFI meeting its statutory mandate. But the superintendent would continue to represent OSFI on supervisory matters. The superintendent would decide how the regulator intervened when a financial firm was failing, which means the superintendent is the right person to answer policy-makers’ questions about such decisions.The reform we propose would add a small number of part-time directors to OSFI’s head count, but only that. The aim is to strengthen oversight of the functions OSFI already performs, not add new ones. Nor should any of OSFI’s current responsibilities be hived off to another agency. Each bears on a financial institution’s ability to function safely, which is precisely OSFI’s mandate. Splitting mandates across agencies would fragment supervision that needs to be integrated.The current model has some clear advantages. Accountability under a single head is unambiguous, and decisions can be made quickly. But these are arguments for designing a board with care, not for clinging to the current governance structure.Two further changes would round out the reform. OSFI draws its authority from Parliament yet appears before parliamentary committees only occasionally. Having the superintendent appear regularly — as the Bank of Canada does voluntarily, at least twice a year — would strengthen accountability without touching independence. And OSFI’s governance should be reviewed at least once a decade, so its structure never again drifts out of date.In 1998, the MacKay Task Force recommended a board for OSFI. Concerns about accountability stalled that proposal then. Thoughtful design of a board can address those concerns. Let’s not wait for a crisis to make the argument for us.Jamey Hubbs held various positions at OSFI from 2012 to 2022, retiring as vice-superintendent. Mawakina Bafale is a research officer at the C.D. Howe Institute. Join the Conversation This website uses cookies to personalize your content (including ads), and allows us to analyze our traffic. Read more about cookies here. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.