For many people, a luxury SUV is seen as the ultimate sign of financial success. But what if the same Rs 50 lakh could be used to create a steady income instead of becoming an expensive liability? Chartered Accountant Nitin Kaushik recently sparked a debate on social media by comparing the cost of buying a premium SUV with investing in a fleet of electric rickshaws. His comparison highlights a broader lesson about cash flow, wealth creation and the difference between looking rich and becoming rich.CA Nitin Kaushik took to X to challenge the idea that expensive vehicles always represent smart financial decisions. Using the example of a luxury SUV, he argued that spending around Rs 50 lakh on a depreciating asset, unless it genuinely serves a business or practical purpose, is one of the quickest ways to "look rich while bleeding cash."Why the CA prefers income-generating assetsInstead of putting the money into a luxury vehicle, Kaushik suggested allocating the same capital toward purchasing 20 commercial electric rickshaws, each costing approximately Rs 2.5 lakh as a base price. He noted that this estimate excludes additional expenses such as registration, insurance and charging infrastructure.According to him, this approach transforms what would otherwise be a depreciating liability into a productive asset capable of generating recurring income.— Finance_Bareek (@Finance_Bareek) You Might Also Like: How the numbers add upKaushik explained that with conservative fleet utilisation, each e-rickshaw could generate gross collections of around Rs 300 to Rs 400 per day. Across a fleet of 20 vehicles, that translates to approximately Rs 1.8 lakh to Rs 2.4 lakh in monthly gross collections. However, he cautioned that gross revenue should not be confused with actual earnings.After accounting for expenses such as driver payouts, battery charging, maintenance, insurance and idle days when vehicles may not be operating, he estimated the realistic net monthly income at roughly Rs 80,000 to Rs 1.2 lakh. Even after these deductions, he described the returns as meaningful. It is a business, not passive incomeKaushik also stressed that this investment should not be mistaken for passive income. Managing a fleet of commercial vehicles requires active involvement, including overseeing operations, handling maintenance, dealing with downtime and ensuring regulatory compliance. Unlike investments such as fixed deposits or debt funds, the capital invested in commercial e-rickshaws is relatively illiquid and carries both operational and regulatory risks. In other words, while the potential returns may be attractive, they come with ongoing responsibilities and uncertainties.You Might Also Like:The larger lesson on building wealthKaushik concluded by saying that real financial intelligence lies in prioritising cash flow-generating assets over expensive status symbols. At the same time, he urged investors to remain realistic about the effort involved. According to him, income-producing assets are valuable, but they require clear-eyed consideration of the work, risks and management needed to generate those returns consistently.You Might Also Like:
Rs 50 lakh SUV or 20 e-rickshaws? CA says one could earn up to Rs 1.2 lakh a month
A Chartered Accountant's social media post ignited a debate by contrasting a Rs 50 lakh luxury SUV with investing in 20 electric rickshaws. He argues that while an SUV is a depreciating asset, the e-rickshaws can generate a net monthly income of Rs 80,000 to Rs 1.2 lakh, highlighting the difference between appearing wealthy and truly building it through income-generating assets.
472 words~2 min read
