June 29, 2026
4 min read
Add topic to email alerts
Receive an email when new articles are posted on
Please provide your email address to receive an email when new articles are posted on .
A newly proposed rule would change the structure of how federal grants are reviewed and awarded, with downstream effects on government-funded health and medical research.The rule, proposed by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), would rewrite the framework of regulations governing federal financial assistance and designate it as legally binding, rather than guidance adopted by individual
June 29, 2026
4 min read
Add topic to email alerts
Receive an email when new articles are posted on
Please provide your email address to receive an email when new articles are posted on .

How The OMB Rule Could Hurt You And Your Town

How The OMB Rule Will Hurt You And Your Town

Opinion | I Was an NIH Program Official. Here's What a Peer Reviewer Doesn’t See.

The war against ‘woke’ could end US science as we know it

Inside the new political screening that’s stalling NIH grants

Cassidy's new plan to overhaul 340B: Rebates, contract pharmacy limits and more changes

The OMB proposal threatens scientific research and ALL federal funding for states, cities, and nonprofits. It politicizes ALL…

Intent is to cut DEI, but scientists see a dystopian, anti-science power grab

The OMB proposal threatens scientific research and ALL federal funding for states, cities, and nonprofits. It politicizes ALL…

Sweeping proposed rule, now open for comments, would also restrict foreign collaborations and remove federal funding for…

Peer review now optional, political staff would screen grants for forbidden topics.

The Trump administration has released a sweeping proposal to overhaul the bedrock regulation for all federal grants.