This series started as a cheap-model brag and keeps getting better comments than posts. Three readers — @nazar_boyko, @txdesk, and @jugeni — independently converged on the same seam, and @jugeni put it in one line I can't improve on:
AUTO wants a corroborator the model cannot write, not a confidence it can.
Here's what that means, and why it's the sharpest critique this design has taken.
Four signals, but not four of a kind
Quick recap of the earlier posts: the LLM scores four features per email — confidence, senderTrust, reversibility, urgency — and a deterministic rule maps those to a tier. The model perceives; a rule I can read decides.
