Brera Holdings PLC (d/b/a Solmate Infrastructure) Announces Results of 2026 Annual General Meeting; Shareholders Decisively Re-Elect All Company’s Five Director Nominees by Wide Margins
Voting Results Reaffirm Shareholder Confidence in the Board Despite Misguided Campaign by RBCH Ltd.
Shareholders Overwhelmingly Reject RockawayX’s Control Campaign as Company Reaffirms Intent to Pursue Claims and Protect Shareholders
Brera Holdings PLC (Nasdaq: SLMT) (the “Company” or “Solmate”) today announced the voting results in respect of Proposal No. 1 and Proposal No. 2 of its 2026 Annual General Meeting of Shareholders (the “AGM”), held on June 26, 2026. At the AGM, shareholders duly re-elected all five of the Company’s director nominees - Ron Sade, Alyazi Saeed Ahmad Alkhattal Almheiri, Erez Simha, Tariq Salem Ebraheem Alsaman Alnuaimi and Keren Maimon, each by a wide margin, with support ranging from approximately 62% to nearly 70% of shares voted, on turnout of 71.49% of shares outstanding.
The result is a clear, across-the-board endorsement of the leadership of the current Board of Directors of the Company (the “Board”), delivered notwithstanding a campaign by RBCH Ltd. (“RBCH”), an affiliate of RockawayX and its Managing Partner and CEO, Viktor Fischer, which had urged shareholders to withhold support from the Board’s nominees. Shareholders saw through that campaign for what it is — a self-interested attempt by a spurned counterparty to seize control of the Company after the Board rejected Mr. Fischer’s proposal to sell his business, RockawayX. The Company believes RockawayX’s attempt to sell the business was based on an inflated valuation built on misleading financial representations. The Board’s rejection of Mr. Fischer’s proposal came after a thorough review of the available information, following which the Board determined that the proposed transaction was not in the best interests of the Company and declined to pursue it. Rather than accepting the Board’s informed business judgment, RBCH and Mr. Fischer responded to that rejection not with legitimate engagement, but with a coordinated pressure campaign — a board-removal requisition, a vote-no campaign aimed at certain directors, and a derivative lawsuit filed on the eve of the AGM. RBCH’s effort to single out Mr. Sade and Ms. Maimon in particular gained no traction with shareholders, who returned the entire slate by comparable margins.
