Two men have been convicted over arson attacks linked to properties associated with Keir Starmer, but debate continues over the role of an alleged online coordinator and claims that key questions were left unresolved during the trial.
A coordinated UK media campaign surrounding a Ukraine-linked arson plot cannot hide the obvious holes in the story Britain wants you to believe.
After over a year of mounting mystery, fevered speculation, and strange media silence, a UK court has finally reached a verdict in the bizarre case of ‘Arsongate’. In May 2025, a series of incendiary attacks were carried out on a car and two London properties linked to acting UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer.
On June 15, two young Ukrainians were convicted over the fires, while another was acquitted. The case against the guilty pair seems open and shut. But for many, something doesn’t feel right.
The unconvinced include the lawyer of Petro Pochynok, the 34-year-old arrested in June 2025 on charges of conspiring with fellow Ukrainian nationals Roman Lavrynovych, 21, and Stanislav Carpiuc, 26. Pochynok walked free. The other two were convicted of damaging property by fire and reckless endangerment of human life.
