Skip to Content Subscribe Our Offers My Account Manage My Subscriptions FAQ Newsletters Canada Canadian True Crime Canadian Politics Health World Israel & Middle East Financial Post NP Comment Longreads Puzzmo Diversions Comics NP News Quiz New York Times Crossword Horoscopes Life Eating & Drinking Style Sponsored Play for Ontario Travel Travel Canada Travel USA Travel International Cruises Travel Essentials Culture Books Celebrity Movies Music Theatre Television Business Essentials Advice Lives Told Tails Told Shopping Buy Canadian Home Living Outdoor Living Kitchen & Dining Tech Style & Beauty Personal Care Entertainment & Hobbies Gift Guide Travel Guide Amazon Prime Day Deals Savings National Post Store More Sports Hockey Baseball Basketball Football Soccer Golf Tennis Driving Vehicle Research Reviews News Gear Guide Obituaries Place an Obituary Place an In Memoriam Classifieds Place an Ad Celebrations Working Business Ads Archives Healthing Epaper Manage Print Subscription Profile Settings My Subscriptions Saved Articles My Offers Newsletters Customer Service FAQ Newsletters Canada World Financial Post NP Comment Longreads Puzzmo Diversions Life Shopping Epaper Manage Print Subscription HomeNewsCanadian PoliticsSmall rodents are to blame for the changes in Canada’s pesticide laws. Here's whyThe situation has affected a wide variety of crops, including canola, cereal and cornLast updated 4 minutes ago You can save this article by registering for free here. Or sign-in if you have an account.A gopher, or Richardson's ground squirrel, west of Milk River, Alberta. Photo by Mike Drew /PostmediaOTTAWA — Earlier this spring, the federal government announced it would be temporarily lifting a two-year ban on a controversial rodenticide called strychnine until next year following damages worth hundreds of millions by a particular rodent in Alberta and Saskatchewan.Enjoy the latest local, national and international news.Exclusive articles by Conrad Black, Barbara Kay and others. Plus, special edition NP Platformed and First Reading newsletters and virtual events.Unlimited online access to National Post.National Post ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition to view on any device, share and comment on.Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword.Support local journalism.Enjoy the latest local, national and international news.Exclusive articles by Conrad Black, Barbara Kay and others. Plus, special edition NP Platformed and First Reading newsletters and virtual events.Unlimited online access to National Post.National Post ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition to view on any device, share and comment on.Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword.Support local journalism.Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience.Access articles from across Canada with one account.Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments.Enjoy additional articles per month.Get email updates from your favourite authors.Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience.Access articles from across Canada with one accountShare your thoughts and join the conversation in the commentsEnjoy additional articles per monthGet email updates from your favourite authorsSign In or Create an AccountorThe infestation of the Richardson ground squirrels, also colloquially known as gophers, in both provinces was so rampant and the size of the holes they would dig were so big that the tires of tractors would be blown out and other farming equipment would be badly damaged.The situation has affected a wide variety of crops — including canola, cereal and corn — across the Prairies at a time when Canada is aiming to export its resources globally.Alberta and Saskatchewan submitted a joint emergency use request to Health Canada which was approved in late March, but it was already too late by then for farmers to use strychnine this year as the sole authorized manufacturer has faced supply chain issues.A senior government official with knowledge of the deliberations said it took almost three rounds of emergency registration requests for strychnine to be approved at a time when farmers were faced with an “unmanageable infestation” and lacked suitable alternatives.More generally, the official said the government has heard from Canadian innovators and venture capitalists in the agriculture space that they are leaving the country because of a regulatory environment for pesticides that is too cumbersome, risky and unpredictable.“That is something that, I think, is keeping all of us up at night,” they said.That’s why the government has moved this week to amend the Pest Control Products Act to make it easier to reinstate some previously banned pesticides like strychnine in a more timely manner — a disposition, the government claims, will be used only in exceptional circumstances when necessary to protect Canada’s economy or food security.“Let’s be clear: the health and safety of Canadians will always be the priority,” said Alexandre Bergeron, press secretary to Health Minister Marjorie Michel.Canada has given some exceptional new powers to the Governor in Council to amend registration or reauthorize a previously deregistered or banned pesticide if the country is faced with another situation that would have significant impacts on the economy.The changes were buried in Bill C-30 — which implements elements of the spring economic update — which was rushed through the House of Commons and the Senate this week before leaving for summer. The legislation received royal assent on Thursday.The government had announced its intention in the update to amend the Canadian Food Inspection Agency Act and the Pest Control Products Act to include consideration of food security and cost of food, but it did not explicitly mention authorizing banned pesticides.The law now says the federal minister of health is to consider “as appropriate, national economic security, regional economic security or national food security” in deciding whether a pest control product should be used in Canada.The news was welcomed by farmers and agricultural groups who said it will help with food affordability, but environmental and health organizations are sounding the alarm, saying politicians will be able to override science-based data to favour commercial interests.“Giving cabinet the power to authorize the use of pesticides despite unacceptable risks is a dangerous departure from science-based decision-making,” Lisa Gue, national policy manager at the David Suzuki Foundation, said in a joint press release with other groups.Jane McArthur, from the Canadian Association of Physicians for the Environment, said the escalation in toxic hazards will create real harms — increasing miscarriages, neurological diseases, contaminating ecosystems and weakening protections for future generations.But Scott Ross, executive director at the Canadian Federation of Agriculture, said it is essential to align regulatory systems with food security and agricultural productivity.Opposition parties have complained that there was nearly or no consultation or opportunity to study the changes to pesticide laws, as C-30 was rammed through the House of Commons finance committee after hours of obstruction by Conservatives.Green Party Leader Elizabeth May attempted to water down the part on the Pest Control Products Act with amendments that were rejected. But the government accepted four of Liberal MP Steven Guilbeault’s amendments which increase transparency on decisions.The Senate was equally frustrated to have to pass C-30 without having heard from experts. Sen. Rosa Galvez, an expert in pollution control, said the provisions on pesticides deserved a separate legislative process and a comprehensive study before approving them.Progressives are increasingly growing frustrated with the Liberals’ deference to big business groups. NDP MP Gord Johns said the Liberals are letting “corporate lobbyists write the rules on pesticides rather than prioritizing the health and safety of Canadians.”National Post calevesque@postmedia.comOur website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our newsletters here. Join the Conversation This website uses cookies to personalize your content (including ads), and allows us to analyze our traffic. Read more about cookies here. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
Small rodents are to blame for the changes in Canada’s pesticide laws. Here's why
The changes were buried in Bill C-30 — which implements elements of the spring economic update and became law this week.
Canada lifted a two-year strychnine ban after Richardson ground squirrels (gophers) caused hundreds of millions in Alberta/Saskatchewan crop and equipment damage. Agri-tech investors are leaving Canada due to unpredictable pesticide regulations—signaling regulatory risk in emerging tech sectors.








