Stay up to date with notifications from The IndependentNotifications can be managed in browser preferences.Jump to contentThank you for registeringPlease refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged inAllNewsSportCultureLifestyle(Getty Images)The Trump administration requested National Park visitors report exhibits deemed "negative" about Americans, aiming to restore sites as "uplifting public monuments." An analysis of 35,000 public comments, disclosed through a Sierra Club lawsuit, revealed that the vast majority sharply criticized the administration's initiative, with many calling it "un-American." Interior Secretary Doug Burgum's order targeted "inappropriate content," leading to the removal or modification of at least 59 signs and exhibits, according to the watchdog group Save Our Signs. These alterations notably affected content referring to slavery, climate change, women’s rights, and Native American history, such as exhibits on enslaved individuals at Independence National Historical Park. Public comments also included strong political criticism, with some comparing the policy to "fascist" tactics, while others expressed dismay at references to contemporary philosophies like DEI and critical race theory. In fullTrump’s National Parks crackdown backfires in spectacular fashionThank you for registeringPlease refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in
Trump opened a complaint line and got 35,000 complaints about himself
Stay up to date with notifications from The IndependentNotifications can be managed in browser preferences.Jump to contentThank you for registeringPlease refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged inAllNewsSportCultureLifestyle(Getty Images)The Trump administration requested National Park visitors report exhibits deemed "negative" about Americans, aiming to restore sites as "uplifting public monuments." An analysis of 35,000 public comments, disclosed through a Sierra Club lawsuit, revealed that the vast majority sharply criticized the administration's initiative, with many calling it "un-American." Interior Secretary Doug Burgum's order targeted "inappropriate content," leading to the removal or modification of at least 59 signs and exhibits, according to the watchdog group Save Our Signs. These alterations notably affected content referring to slavery, climate change, women’s rights, and Native American history, such as exhibits on enslaved individuals at Independence National Historical Park. Public comments also included strong political criticism, with some comparing the policy to "fascist" tactics, while others expressed dismay at references to contemporary philosophies like DEI and critical race theory. In fullTrump’s National Parks crackdown backfires in spectacular fashionThank you for registeringPlease refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in
