<!-- wp:image {"id":2037265,"sizeSlug":"full","linkDestination":"none"} --><figure class="wp-block-image size-full"><img src="https://newsinfo.inquirer.net/files/2025/02/MARCOSES.jpg" alt="GLOBE-TROTTER Former first lady Imelda Marcos was once the jet-setting personal envoy of President Ferdinand Marcos Sr.

(left photo).

She’s now95, her globe-trotting days behind her, but her family is back in power." class="wp-image-2037265" /><figcaption class="wp-element-caption">Photos show Former President Ferdinand Marcos Sr. and Former First Lady Imelda Marcos on the left and First lady Imelda Marcos on the right.

(Inquirer file pictures) <br></figcaption></figure><!-- /wp:image --><!-- wp:paragraph --><p>MANILA, Philippines — The Special Division of the Sandiganbayan has junked the remaining asset claims in the forfeiture case involving the alleged ill-gotten wealth against the late dictator Ferdinand Marcos Sr. and former First Lady Imelda Marcos. </p><!-- /wp:paragraph --><!-- wp:paragraph --><p>In a resolution dated June 2, 2026, the Sandiganbayan said the Presidential Commission on Good Government (PCGG) filed a manifestation last 12 saying it would no longer present evidence “with respect to the remaining listed properties not covered by the partial summary judgements.” </p><!-- /wp:paragraph --><!-- wp:paragraph --><p>The PCGG is mandated to recover the alleged ill-gotten wealth of the Marcoses. </p><!-- /wp:paragraph --><!-- wp:paragraph --><p><strong>READ: <a href="http://Sandiganbayan drops P276-M civil case vs Marcos estate due to delay">Sandiganbayan drops P276-M civil case vs Marcos estate due to delay</a></strong></p><!-- /wp:paragraph --><!-- wp:paragraph --><p>The Special Division noted that the course of action was based on the PCGG’s advice, noting that most of the properties were already recovered through other measures. </p><!-- /wp:paragraph --><!-- wp:paragraph --><p>“In view of petitioner’s manifestation and the absence of evidence concerning the remaining properties, the proceedings in this case, insofar as they relate to properties not covered by the four partial summary judgments are now terminated,” the Special Division stated. </p><!-- /wp:paragraph --><!-- wp:paragraph --><p>“ACCORDINGLY, Civil Case No. 0141 is DISMISSED, insofar as it concerns the remaining properties not subject of the previous partial summary judgments,” it added. </p><!-- /wp:paragraph --><!-- wp:paragraph --><p><strong>READ: <a href="https://newsinfo.inquirer.net/2036757/neglected-and-forgotten-marcos-wealth-case-junked">‘Neglected and forgotten’ Marcos wealth case junked</a></strong></p><!-- /wp:paragraph --><!-- wp:paragraph --><p>The Sandiganbayan noted that the Philippine government had acquired four partial summary judgments, which ordered the forfeiture of 658 million US dollars in “Swiss Deposits,” funds; properties, shares and interests relating to the “Arelma Accounts” worth 3,369,975 US dollars as of 1983; “Malacañang Jewelry Collection” valued between 110,055 to 153,089 US dollars as of 1991; and proceeds from sales of paintings worth 17 million US dollars. </p><!-- /wp:paragraph --><!-- wp:paragraph --><p>The Civil Case No. 0141 was filed on December 17, 1991 for the forfeiture of the properties of the late president and the former first lady that were not covered by earlier forfeiture cases. /apl</p><!-- /wp:paragraph --><!-- wp:paragraph --><p></p><!-- /wp:paragraph --><div><div><div><div><p dir="ltr" style="line-height: 1.44;text-align: justify;margin-top: 0pt;margin-bottom: 0pt"> </p><p dir="ltr" style="line-height: 1.44;text-align: justify;margin-top: 0pt;margin-bottom: 0pt"> </p><p dir="ltr" style="line-height: 1.44;text-align: justify;margin-top: 0pt;margin-bottom: 0pt"> </p><div> </div><div> </div></div></div></div></div><p> </p>