The Garmin Forerunner 170 is technically the better watch, but that doesn't necessarily make it a better value than the 165.
Meredith Dietz
Senior Staff Writer
ExperienceMeredith is a marathon runner and stand-up comedian. As Lifehacker’s Senior Staff Writer, she covers personal fitness tech, home gym equipment, and more.
Areas of Expertise
Read Full Bio
I tested the Garmin Forerunner 70 for two weeks — and it’s my favorite running watch for the money in 2026
Best fitness tracker deal: Save $50 on the Garmin Forerunner 165
I went for a run with the Fitbit Air and Garmin Forerunner 70 to see how the $99 tracker compared, and I’m impressed
How I used a $170 sports watch as my training coach to help me avoid injuries
Amazfit Is Going All-In on Hybrid Smartwatches With the New Balance Series
The Forerunner 165 has a worthy successor at last
Here's how Garmin's new entry-level running watch stacks up against its predecessor.
Both watches here tracked this half-marathon with accuracy I'd feel confident racing with again. But for my full training cycle,…
Premium sports tracker adds built-in torch, smartwatch and accuracy upgrades, plus useful new training tools, but costs far more…
Garmin ha annunciato i nuovi Forerunner 70 e 170, che sostituiscono i vecchi Forerunner 55 e 165, ma di fatto mandano in pensione…
Advanced running features are plentiful on this entry-level smartwatch
