By
David J. Abbott
Columnist
aCatalyst Consulting
“I’d rather argue against a hundred idiots than have one agree with me,” said Winston Churchill.
Leaders often crave certainty, but research and failures like the Challenger disaster show that embracing uncertainty and dissent can improve decision-making—or prevent costly errors.
By
David J. Abbott
Columnist
aCatalyst Consulting
“I’d rather argue against a hundred idiots than have one agree with me,” said Winston Churchill.

The Discipline of Not Fooling Ourselves: Episode 7 — The Cost of Certainty

Don’t say ‘you’re wrong’—the most successful people use these 5 phrases instead

Leading with clarity in a geopolitically chaotic era

'Don’t be yourself' in the workplace, actually, Columbia professor says. Here’s why authenticity is 'overrated' | Fortune

Monday Motivation by Robin Sharma: 'Sometimes success isn't about making the right decision, it's more about...'

Confidence drives action—but moderate self-doubt refines it. Learn how leaders who stay curious, humble, and aware avoid hubris…

If the organization's first instinct is to restore confidence rather than investigate uncertainty,...

Research has shown that fortune favors the bold, not the cautious. But in volatile and uncertain times, many leaders hesitate to…

Investor and author Eric Becker is co-chairman of Cresset Capital, a wealth management firm with more than $70 billion in assets…

If you're a leader, the Aristotle Advantage can be a shield. Critical thinking combines the “what I know” of hard facts with the…

Good judgement, particularly when separating good ideas from bad ones, comes from a place of openness and naivete, not cynicism,…