Former Walmart worker who stole over $7K worth of stuff given house arrest partially due to 'risk of deportation'

Skip to Content Subscribe Our Offers My Account Manage My Subscriptions FAQ Newsletters Canada Canadian True Crime Canadian Politics Health World Israel & Middle East Financial Post NP Comment Longreads Puzzmo Diversions Comics NP News Quiz New York Times Crossword Horoscopes Life Eating & Drinking Style Sponsored Play for Ontario Travel Travel Canada Travel USA Travel International Cruises Travel Essentials Culture Books Celebrity Movies Music Theatre Television Business Essentials Advice Lives Told Tails Told Shopping Buy Canadian Home Living Outdoor Living Tech Style & Beauty Kitchen & Dining Personal Care Entertainment & Hobbies Gift Guide Travel Guide Deals Savings National Post Store More Sports Hockey Baseball Basketball Football Soccer Golf Tennis Driving Vehicle Research Reviews News Gear Guide Obituaries Place an Obituary Place an In Memoriam Classifieds Place an Ad Celebrations Working Business Ads Archives Healthing Epaper Manage Print Subscription Profile Settings My Subscriptions Saved Articles My Offers Newsletters Customer Service FAQ Newsletters Canada World Financial Post NP Comment Longreads Puzzmo Diversions Life Shopping Epaper Manage Print Subscription HomeNewsCanadaFormer Walmart worker who stole over $7K worth of stuff given house arrest partially due to 'risk of deportation''Risk of deportation' helped sway decision by Alberta justiceLast updated 27 minutes ago You can save this article by registering for free here. Or sign-in if you have an account.The interior of an Edmonton Court of King's Bench courtroom. Photo by Ed Kaiser /PostmediaA woman who came to Canada from India on a student visa almost 10 years ago and who pleaded guilty to stealing more than $7,000 from her employer has been given a sentence of house arrest after the judge took into account the “collateral immigration consequences” if she were to be given prison time.Enjoy the latest local, national and international news.Exclusive articles by Conrad Black, Barbara Kay and others. Plus, special edition NP Platformed and First Reading newsletters and virtual events.Unlimited online access to National Post.National Post ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition to view on any device, share and comment on.Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword.Support local journalism.Enjoy the latest local, national and international news.Exclusive articles by Conrad Black, Barbara Kay and others. Plus, special edition NP Platformed and First Reading newsletters and virtual events.Unlimited online access to National Post.National Post ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition to view on any device, share and comment on.Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword.Support local journalism.Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience.Access articles from across Canada with one account.Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments.Enjoy additional articles per month.Get email updates from your favourite authors.Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience.Access articles from across Canada with one accountShare your thoughts and join the conversation in the commentsEnjoy additional articles per monthGet email updates from your favourite authorsSign In or Create an AccountorThe case was decided this year by the Alberta Court of Justice under Justice James J. Ogle.The ruling notes that the woman, age 26, pleaded guilty to one count of stealing “multiple products of a value exceeding $5,000, the property of Walmart, contrary to section 334(A) of the criminal Code of Canada,” between January and March of 2024.Get a dash of perspective along with the trending news of the day in a very readable format.By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc.A welcome email is on its way. If you don't see it, please check your junk folder.The next issue of NP Posted will soon be in your inbox.We encountered an issue signing you up. Please try again“The maximum penalty for this offence is 10 years imprisonment,” court records state. “There is no minimum sentence.”According to an agreed statement of facts, the woman worked at Walmart as a customer service clerk. On at least 14 occasions over a five-week period, she stole goods from Walmart’s Cochrane, Alberta, location, either by herself or in concert with others, including her boyfriend.The relationship ended more than a year ago. “None of the other participants in these thefts has been charged, and none of these others were employees of Walmart,” court records state.The woman’s primary method of theft was to ring in goods not with the barcode of the item in question but with the one used for individual photo purchases, which was 32 cents.“Now armed with a sales receipt, she or her accomplices would then exit the store without paying the correct price for each of the items taken,” the statement notes.The woman has lived in Canada since she arrived on a student visa at the age of 17, though she has taken several trips back to India over the years to see family. She obtained permanent residency status in Canada in 2024.“She has worked in the past in Canada in several different retail store positions,” court records state. Since being fired by Walmart, she has worked as security in a warehouse for about a year. “She does not like her current job,” the record adds.Under aggravating factors, the justice noted that the method of theft was relatively sophisticated and required the woman’s knowledge of Walmart’s practices to lessen the chances of discovery.He also noted: “This was not a single incident of theft but rather numerous thefts over several weeks, continuing up to the day she ceased to be an employee of Walmart.”He added: “The total value of the goods taken is just over $7,000. None of the merchandise has been recovered.”Court records also note: “The defence submits there are numerous mitigating and other factors — including a risk of deportation — that justify a Conditional Discharge.” A conditional discharge would avoid a permanent criminal conviction on the woman’s record.The justice wrote that the Crown was not seeking imprisonment but rather “a 6-month Conditional Sentence of Imprisonment,” commonly known as house arrest, “noting a number of mitigating factors including her lack of a prior criminal record, timely guilty plea, expression of remorse, promise of full restitution, personal background, and potential immigration consequences.”The justice referenced a 1976 Alberta case that noted: “Theft from an employer would, in most cases, involving as it does a breach of trust, not warrant a discharge.”The Immigration and Refugee Protection Act notes: “A permanent resident or a foreign national is inadmissible on grounds of serious criminality for … having been convicted in Canada of an offence under an Act of Parliament punishable by a maximum term of imprisonment of at least 10 years, or of an offence under an Act of Parliament for which a term of imprisonment of more than six months has been imposed.”The justice added: “The Crown opposes a Conditional Discharge in this matter, citing a number of cases, including, in particular, cases from the Alberta Court of Appeal that repeatedly state that a conditional discharge is not an appropriate sentence in cases of theft from employer such as the matter before me.”The justice agreed with the Crown that a conditional discharge was not appropriate, but chose to sentence the woman “to a Conditional Sentence of Imprisonment (CSO) for a period of 5 and ½ months.”Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here. Join the Conversation This website uses cookies to personalize your content (including ads), and allows us to analyze our traffic. Read more about cookies here. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.