The judges held that pension schemes, whether public or private, are savings vehicles managed independently by trustees solely for the benefit of employees.
By
Sam Kiplagat
Court Reporter
Nation Media Group
Pension funds sponsored by public entities belong to contributors and are not public funds subject to State procurement laws, the Supreme Court has ruled.
EPS-95 Higher Pension: Employees contributing to EPF on actual wages cannot be denied higher EPS 95 pension if they were EPS members on September 1, 2014, rules HC - The Economic Times
Tribunal dismisses employer’s bid to avoid paying provident fund after worker withdrew membership via Whatsapp
State appeals ruling it breached Constitution by refusing spouse’s pension to bereaved partner
No Constitutional embargo on State legislature in giving benefits to MLAs, ex-MLAs: Allahabad HC
The decision overturns earlier rulings by the High Court and Court of Appeal, which had upheld Section 2(o) of the PPADA and…
For years, pension schemes linked to public institutions have been subjected to procurement frameworks designed for government…
Deputy Pension Funds Adjudicator Naheem Essop has ruled that the Municipal Employees Pension Fund must grant a complainant access…
The recent Premium Pension arbitration may come to be remembered not merely as a boardroom dispute, but as a moment when…
Cofek says the pension fund's latest directive has deepened confusion over mandatory deductions following a disputed Court of…
The Supreme Court of Appeal has upheld a ruling clarifying that retirement funds have 12 months from the date of awareness of a…
