Current sectionIsrael NewsIsrael SecurityShin Bet chief David Zini is seeking a contempt of court ruling against three former agency chiefs who refused to disclose the names of 180 former employees who joined a petition against his appointment. A High Court justice earlier ruled that Zini should be allowed to view the namesShare to FacebookShare to XArticle printing is available to subscribers onlyPrint in a simple, ad-free formatSubscribeComments: Zen reading is available to subscribers onlyAd-free and in a comfortable reading formatSubscribeGidi Weitz09:12 PM • May 17 2026 IDTShin Bet chief David Zini on Sunday filed a motion for contempt of court after three of his predecessors refused to disclose the identities of those who signed a petition against his appointment to head the internal security agency.Loading...Click the alert icon to follow topics:Shin BetIsrael Supreme CourtIsraeli politicsDavid ZiniCommentsLoading...In the NewsIn the News: Israel-Iran Live UpdatesHamasIsrael ElectionsLebanonNoam BettanSettler ViolenceHaQuizHaaretz PodcastLegal Sources: Incoming Mossad Chief May Have Obstructed His Vetting ProcessHaredi Draft Exemption Talks to Renew After Parties Threaten to Dissolve KnessetOnly 7% Approved: Palestinian Construction Collapses in East JerusalemIsrael's Defense, Finance Ministries Spar Over Oct. 7 Terrorists Tribunal BudgetIsrael to Establish Defense Offices in Former UNRWA East Jerusalem CompoundRemembering and rebuilding two years laterICYMIThe Hasidic Jews Behind Florida's Giant Golden Trump StatueStarlink Users, Beware – Israeli Tech Can Reveal Your IdentityIt Wasn't Just Revenge That Israel Was After in GazaWelcome to the Most Shameful Day in the Jewish CalendarIsraeli Teens Storm Muslim Quarter in Old City, Haaretz Reporter AttackedIsrael Attacks New York Times for Report on Sexual Violence by Israeli Forces
Shin Bet head files contempt motion after ex-chiefs hide dissenting worker names
Shin Bet Chief David Zini Is Seeking a Contempt of Court Ruling Against Three Former Agency Chiefs Who Refused to Disclose the Names of 180 Former Employees Who Joined a Petition Against His Appointment. A High Court Justice Earlier Ruled That Zini Should Be Allowed to View the Names







