The former ambassador to the US has some serious matters to explain
Copy link
Starmer’s judgment over Mandelson looks worse than ever
The former ambassador to the US has some serious matters to explain
451 words~2 min read
Related reading
Starmer’s excuse for the delay in sacking Mandelson doesn’t add up
Timeline shows Labour grandee had long been close to Epstein, even after his first conviction
The Daily T: Why Peter Mandelson’s Epstein mea culpa won’t cut it
The US ambassador has said he regrets “ever having met” the convicted paedophile but that more “very embarrassing” details will…
Starmer has questions to answer about Mandelson’s appointment
How did the vetting process allow a ‘best pal’ of notorious paedophile Epstein to become Britain’s ambassador to the US?
Mandelson documents raise questions about Starmer’s decision-making
PM knew of US ambassador’s ‘close relationship’ with Jeffrey Epstein and potential conflicts of interest from his lobbying role
Starmer backs Mandelson after private messages to Epstein revealed
Prime Minister’s support comes as Wes Streeting says Mandelson ‘has more to say’ on association with paedophile
Starmer has further questions to answer
If the Prime Minister did not read Mandelson’s emails to Epstein until now, why did he publicly declare confidence in the…
