Creators and commentators are more anxious than ever about their safety. Some are wondering whether they should continue to make themselves so accessible.
Charlie Kirk
(1993-2025)
Supported by
Creators and commentators are more anxious than ever about their safety. Some are wondering whether they should continue to make themselves so accessible.
By Jessica TestaJoseph Bernstein and Callie Holtermann
Multiple people lose jobs after posts, comments about Charlie Kirk assassination
Charlie Kirk’s assassination is a terrifying moment for American democracy
Social media has us in its grip and won’t let go. The Charlie Kirk killing is a case study
Charlie Kirk was a symbol for many young people. Now what?
How Charlie Kirk’s death fed the content machine
Virulent debater and clickbait savant: how Charlie Kirk pushed a new generation to the right
Charlie Kirk’s killing was a tragedy. But we must not rewrite his life | Moira Donegan
Charlie Kirk’s killing has only made the conservative movement stronger
Social media posts about Charlie Kirk's death are baffling companies and exposing a bigger problem in American business | Fortune
Over 100 people have faced consequences for remarks about Charlie Kirk's death
After the assassination of the young conservative activist, some are receiving blowback for expressing sadness or sympathy online.
Public figures, academics and everyday business owners have faced consequences for comments that contained jokes, celebrations or…
The young conservative activist made his name by putting himself at the heart of debate on college campuses. It left him…
The two men had very different politics. But as a fellow star of a new political media class, the left-wing streamer had a…
Charlie Kirk’s mastery of social media was key to his rise as an influence in conservative politics. So the extent to which his…
Initial expressions of grief and shock were overtaken by open calls for reckoning and vengeance, as some proclaimed the country…
