To deny empathy to Kirk and his camp is to undermine our stand against the very divisiveness we criticise.
To deny empathy to Kirk and his camp is to undermine our stand against the very divisiveness we criticise.
By Christopher Rhodes
Lecturer in Government at Harvard University and lecturer in Social Sciences at Boston University.
Share
Save
GOP Anger Over Kirk Critics' Comments Leads To Online Abuse, Firings
Charlie Kirk | Death of a culture crusader
Charlie Kirk’s death is a tragic marker of the indiscriminate nature of political violence | Margaret Sullivan
Charlie Kirk’s killing was a tragedy. But we must not rewrite his life | Moira Donegan
Charlie Kirk’s assassination is a terrifying moment for American democracy
Opinion | Charlie Kirk Didn’t Shy Away From Who He Was. We Shouldn’t Either.
Charlie Kirk: Young fans and critics debate his political legacy
The Guardian view on the killing of Charlie Kirk: a perilous moment that may lead to more | Editorial
Charlie Kirk’s shocking killing sets the stage for a federal crackdown | Moustafa Bayoumi
Leftists cheering Kirk killing are ‘evil’ says pundit’s final debating partner
Republicans' anger at those disrespecting Kirk's legacy contrasts with the mockery some of the same figures – including Kirk –…
A family member says he had turned political recently and hated Kirk. But Robinson’s family is staunchly Republican.
The Hindu’s profile on Charlie Kirk
The Left might mischaracterise his work, but his Christian example continues to inspire a generation of young men
Like an infectious disease, it efficiently finds more and more victims. It’s not picky about who they are
In the wake of horror, honest accountings of his life have not only become rare – they have also become dangerous
