The ruling isn't a guarantee for how similar cases will proceed, but it lays the foundations for a precedent that would side with tech companies over creatives.
Biotech & Health
Climate
Cloud Computing
Commerce
EVs
US judge allows company to train AI using copyrighted literary materials
Judge rules Anthropic did not violate authors' copyrights with AI book training
US Judge sides with AI firm Anthropic over copyright issue
Anthropic Scores a Landmark AI Copyright Win—but Will Face Trial Over Piracy Claims
Anthropic did not breach copyright when training AI on books without permission, court rules
Judge rules Anthropic's use of books to train AI model is fair use - UPI.com
Called Bartz v. Anthropic, the case deals with Anthropic's use of books as training material for its large language models.
A federal judge sided with Meta in a lawsuit that alleged the company had illegally trained its AI models on copyrighted works.
Ruling sides against authors who alleged that Anthropic trained an AI model using their work without consent.
The decision is a major win for AI companies as legal battles play out over the use and application of copyrighted works in LLMs
A US court has ruled Anthropic was not breaching copyright rules when it trained its AI model on books.
After spending nearly an hour mostly lambasting Anthropic's settlement, Judge William Alsup scheduled another hearing on…
